Worldwide Equipment Guide

This Worldwide Equipment Guide (WEG) describes the spectrum of worldwide equipment and system trends in the Complex Operational Environment (COE). Tier Tables provide baseline examples of systems with counterparts in other capability tiers. Other systems are added to offer flexibility for tailoring the force systems mix. Substitution Tables offer other system choices versus baseline examples.

The OPFOR in the COE should also include options for portraying “hybrid threat”. Hybrid threat is defined as:

…the diverse and dynamic combination of regular forces, irregular forces, terrorist forces, and/or criminal elements, all unified to achieve mutually benefitting effects.

The OPFOR may use conventional weapons; however regular and irregular forces may also employ improvised systems, as described throughout this guide. Upgrade tables are included to capture WEG systems changes reflecting contemporary upgrade trends.  Systems and technologies in Chapter 10, Countermeasures, Upgrades, and Emerging Technology, can be used in simulations for Near-Term and Mid-Term scenarios.

The pages in this WEG are designed for use in electronic form or for insertion into loose -leaf notebooks. This guide will be updated as often as necessary, in order to include additional systems, variants, and  upgrades that are appropriate  for OPFOR use.

We have attempted to make the information available more user friendly, easily accessible,  and  concise. Therefore, much of the narrative on some systems has been updated and edited. If  you have questions on the presentation of information or anything else included in this guide, contact the helpdesk.

How To Use Guide

The WEG is organized by categories of equipment, in chapters. The format of the equipment pages is basically a listing of parametric data. This permits updating on a standardized basis as data becomes available. For meanings of acronyms and terms, see the Glossary. Please note that, although most terms are the same as in U.S. terminology, some reflect non-U.S. concepts and are not comparable or measurable against U.S. standards. For example, if an OPFOR armor penetration figure does not say RHA (rolled homogeneous armor) do not assume that is the standard for the figure. If there are questions, consult the Glossary, or contact us.

System names reflect intelligence community changes in naming methods. Alternative designations include the manufacturer’s name, as well as U.S./NATO designators. Note  also that  the WEG focuses on the complete weapon system (e.g.,  AT-4/5/5B  antitank  guided missile launcher complex or 9P148 ATGM launcher vehicle), versus a component or munition (9P135 launcher  or  AT-4/5 ATGM).

Many common technical notes and parameters are used in chapters 3 through 6, since the systems contained in those chapters have similar weapon and automotive technologies.   Chapters   2 (Infantry Weapons), 7 (Engineer and CBRN) and 8 (Logistics), offer systems with many unique parameters and therefore may not be consistent with those in other chapters.

• 

  Volume 1: Ground Systems

• 

  Volume 2: Air and Air Defense Systems

• 

  Volume 3: Naval Systems

Units of Measure

The following example symbols and abbreviations are used in this guide:

• (°): degrees (of slope/gradient, elevation, traverse, etc.)
• GHz: gigahertz—frequency (GHz = 1 billion hertz)
• hp: horsepower (kWx1.341 = hp)
• Hz: hertz—unit of frequency
• kg: kilogram(s) (2.2 lb.)
• kg/cm2: kg per square centimeter—pressure
• km: kilometer(s)
• km/h: km per hour
• kt: knot—speed. 1 kt = 1 nautical mile (nm) per hr.
• kW: kilowatt(s) (1 kW = 1,000 watts)
• liters: liters—liquid measurement (1 gal. = 3.785 liters)
• m: meter(s)—if over 1 meter use meters; if under use mm
• m3: cubic meter(s)
• m3/hr: cubic meters per hour—earth moving capacity
• m/hr: meters per hour—operating speed (earth moving)
• MHz: megahertz—frequency (MHz = 1 million hertz)
• mach: mach + (factor) —aircraft velocity (average 1062 km/h)
• mil: milliradian, radial measure (360° = 6400 mils, 6000 Russian)
• min: minute(s)
• mm: millimeter(s)
• m/s: meters per second—velocity
• mt: metric ton(s) (mt = 1,000 kg)
• nm: nautical mile = 6076 ft (1.152 miles or 1.86 km)
• rd/min: rounds per minute—rate of fire
• RHAe: rolled homogeneous armor (equivalent)
• shp: shaft horsepower—helicopter engines (kWx1.341 = shp)
• mm: micron/micrometer—wavelength for lasers, etc.

OPFOR Ground Systems – Tier Tables

The OPFOR organization and equipment must support the entire spectrum of Contemporary Operational Environment in U.S. forces training. The COE OPFOR includes “hybrid threats”, and represents rational and adaptive adversaries for use in training applications and scenarios. The COE time period reflects current training as well as training extending through the Near Term. This chapter deals with current time frame systems. Lists of equipment on these tables offer convenient baseline examples arranged in capability tiers for use in composing OPFOR equipment arrays for training scenarios. For guidance on systems technology capabilities and trends after 2018, the user might look to Countermeasures, Upgrades, and Emerging Technology. Those tables offer capabilities tiers for Near and Mid-Term.

OPFOR equipment is broken into four “tiers” in order to portray systems for adversaries with differing levels of force capabilities for use as representative examples of a rational force developer’s systems mix. Equipment is listed in convenient tier tables for use as a tool for trainers to reflect different levels of modernity. Each tier provides an equivalent level of capability for systems across different functional areas. The tier tables are also another tool to identify systems in simulations to reflect different levels of modernity. The key to using the tables is to know the tier capability of the initial organizations to be provided. Tier 2 (default OPFOR level) reflects modern competitive systems fielded in significant numbers for the last 10 to 20 years.

Systems reflect specific capability mixes, which require specific systems data for portrayal in U.S. training simulations (live, virtual, and constructive). The OPFOR force contains a mix of systems in each tier and functional area which realistically vary in fielded age and generation. The tiers are less about age of the system than realistically reflecting capabilities to be mirrored in training. Systems and functional areas are not modernized equally and simultaneously. Forces have systems and material varying 10 to 30 years in age in a functional area. Often military forces emphasize upgrades in one functional area while neglecting upgrades in other functional areas. Force designers may also draw systems from higher or lower echelons with different tiers to supplement organizational assets. Our functional area analysts have tempered depiction of new and expensive systems to a fraction of the OPFOR force. The more common modernization approach for higher tier systems is to upgrade existing systems.

Some systems are used in both lower and higher tiers. Older 4x4 tactical utility vehicles which are 30 to 40 years old still offer effective support capability, and may extend across three tiers. Common use of some OPFOR systems also reduces database maintenance requirements.

Tier 1 systems are new or upgraded robust state-of-the-art systems marketed for sale, with at least limited fielding, and with capabilities and vulnerabilities representative of trends to be addressed in training. But a major military force with state-of-the-art technology may still have a mix of systems across different functional areas at Tier 1 and lower tiers in 2013.

Tier 2 reflects modern competitive systems fielded in significant numbers for the last 10 to 20 years, with limitations or vulnerabilities being diminished by available upgrades. Although forces are equipped for operations in all terrains and can fight day and night, their capability in range and speed for several key systems may be somewhat inferior to U.S. capability.

Tier 3 systems date back generally 30 to 40 years. They have limitations in all three subsystems categories: mobility, survivability and lethality. Systems and force integration are inferior. However, guns, missiles, and munitions can still challenge vulnerabilities of U.S. forces. Niche upgrades can provide synergistic and adaptive increases in force effectiveness.

Tier 4 systems reflect 40 to 50 year-old systems, some of which have been upgraded numerous times. These represent Third World or smaller developed countries’ forces and irregular forces. Use of effective strategy, adaptive tactics, niche technologies, and terrain limitations can enable a Tier 4 OPFOR to challenge U.S. force effectiveness in achieving its goals. The tier includes militia, guerrillas, special police, and other forces.

Please note: No force in the world has all systems at the most modern tier. Even the best force in the world has a mix of state-of-the-art (Tier 1) systems, as well as mature (Tier 2), and somewhat dated (Tier 3) legacy systems. Many of the latter systems have been upgraded to some degree, but may exhibit limitations from their original state of technology. Even modern systems recently purchased may be considerably less than state-of-the-art, due to budget constraints and limited user training and maintenance capabilities. Thus, even new systems may not exhibit Tier 1 or Tier 2 capabilities. As later forces field systems with emerging technologies, legacy systems may be employed to be more suitable, may be upgraded, and continue to be competitive. Adversaries with lower tier systems can use adaptive technologies and tactics, or obtain niche technology systems to challenge advantages of a modern force. 

A major emphasis in an OPFOR is flexibility in use of forces and in doctrine. This also means OPFOR having flexibility, given rational and justifiable force development methodology, to adapt the systems mix to support doctrine and plans. The tiers provide the baseline list for determining the force mix, based on scenario criteria. The OPFOR compensates for capability limitations by using innovative and adaptive tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTP). Some of these limitations may be caused by the lack of sophisticated equipment or integration capability, or by insufficient numbers. Forces can be tailored in accordance with OPFOR guidance to form tactical groups.

An OPFOR force developer has the option to make selective adjustments such as use of niche technology upgrades such as in tanks, cruise missiles, or rotary-wing aircraft, to offset U.S. advantages (see WEG Chapter 15, Equipment Upgrades). Forces may include systems from outside of the overall force capability level. A Tier 3 force might have a few systems from Tier 1 or 2. The authors will always be ready to assist a developer in selecting niche systems and upgrades for use in OPFOR portrayal. Scenario developers should be able to justify changes and systems selected. With savvy use of TTP and systems, all tiers may offer challenging OPFOR capabilities for training. The Equipment Substitution Matrices can help force designers find weapons to substitute, to reflect those best suited for specific training scenarios.

The OPFOR organization and equipment must support the entire spectrum of Contemporary Operational Environment in U.S. forces training. The COE OPFOR includes “hybrid threats”, and represents rational and adaptive adversaries for use in training applications and scenarios. The COE time period reflects current training as well as training extending through the Near Term. This chapter deals with current time frame systems. Lists of equipment on these tables offer convenient baseline examples arranged in capability tiers for use in composing OPFOR equipment arrays for training scenarios. For guidance on systems technology capabilities and trends after 2018, the user might look to Countermeasures, Upgrades, and Emerging Technology. Those tables offer capabilities tiers for Near and Mid-Term.

OPFOR equipment is broken into four “tiers” in order to portray systems for adversaries with differing levels of force capabilities for use as representative examples of a rational force developer’s systems mix. Equipment is listed in convenient tier tables for use as a tool for trainers to reflect different levels of modernity. Each tier provides an equivalent level of capability for systems across different functional areas. The tier tables are also another tool to identify systems in simulations to reflect different levels of modernity. The key to using the tables is to know the tier capability of the initial organizations to be provided. Tier 2 (default OPFOR level) reflects modern competitive systems fielded in significant numbers for the last 10 to 20 years.

Systems reflect specific capability mixes, which require specific systems data for portrayal in U.S. training simulations (live, virtual, and constructive). The OPFOR force contains a mix of systems in each tier and functional area which realistically vary in fielded age and generation. The tiers are less about age of the system than realistically reflecting capabilities to be mirrored in training. Systems and functional areas are not modernized equally and simultaneously. Forces have systems and material varying 10 to 30 years in age in a functional area. Often military forces emphasize upgrades in one functional area while neglecting upgrades in other functional areas. Force designers may also draw systems from higher or lower echelons with different tiers to supplement organizational assets. Our functional area analysts have tempered depiction of new and expensive systems to a fraction of the OPFOR force. The more common modernization approach for higher tier systems is to upgrade existing systems.

Some systems are used in both lower and higher tiers. Older 4x4 tactical utility vehicles which are 30 to 40 years old still offer effective support capability, and may extend across three tiers. Common use of some OPFOR systems also reduces database maintenance requirements.

Tier 1 systems are new or upgraded robust state-of-the-art systems marketed for sale, with at least limited fielding, and with capabilities and vulnerabilities representative of trends to be addressed in training. But a major military force with state-of-the-art technology may still have a mix of systems across different functional areas at Tier 1 and lower tiers in 2013.

Tier 2 reflects modern competitive systems fielded in significant numbers for the last 10 to 20 years, with limitations or vulnerabilities being diminished by available upgrades. Although forces are equipped for operations in all terrains and can fight day and night, their capability in range and speed for several key systems may be somewhat inferior to U.S. capability.

Tier 3 systems date back generally 30 to 40 years. They have limitations in all three subsystems categories: mobility, survivability and lethality. Systems and force integration are inferior. However, guns, missiles, and munitions can still challenge vulnerabilities of U.S. forces. Niche upgrades can provide synergistic and adaptive increases in force effectiveness.

Tier 4 systems reflect 40 to 50 year-old systems, some of which have been upgraded numerous times. These represent Third World or smaller developed countries’ forces and irregular forces. Use of effective strategy, adaptive tactics, niche technologies, and terrain limitations can enable a Tier 4 OPFOR to challenge U.S. force effectiveness in achieving its goals. The tier includes militia, guerrillas, special police, and other forces.

Please note: No force in the world has all systems at the most modern tier. Even the best force in the world has a mix of state-of-the-art (Tier 1) systems, as well as mature (Tier 2), and somewhat dated (Tier 3) legacy systems. Many of the latter systems have been upgraded to some degree, but may exhibit limitations from their original state of technology. Even modern systems recently purchased may be considerably less than state-of-the-art, due to budget constraints and limited user training and maintenance capabilities. Thus, even new systems may not exhibit Tier 1 or Tier 2 capabilities. As later forces field systems with emerging technologies, legacy systems may be employed to be more suitable, may be upgraded, and continue to be competitive. Adversaries with lower tier systems can use adaptive technologies and tactics, or obtain niche technology systems to challenge advantages of a modern force. 

A major emphasis in an OPFOR is flexibility in use of forces and in doctrine. This also means OPFOR having flexibility, given rational and justifiable force development methodology, to adapt the systems mix to support doctrine and plans. The tiers provide the baseline list for determining the force mix, based on scenario criteria. The OPFOR compensates for capability limitations by using innovative and adaptive tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTP). Some of these limitations may be caused by the lack of sophisticated equipment or integration capability, or by insufficient numbers. Forces can be tailored in accordance with OPFOR guidance to form tactical groups.

An OPFOR force developer has the option to make selective adjustments such as use of niche technology upgrades such as in tanks, cruise missiles, or rotary-wing aircraft, to offset U.S. advantages (see WEG Chapter 15, Equipment Upgrades). Forces may include systems from outside of the overall force capability level. A Tier 3 force might have a few systems from Tier 1 or 2. The authors will always be ready to assist a developer in selecting niche systems and upgrades for use in OPFOR portrayal. Scenario developers should be able to justify changes and systems selected. With savvy use of TTP and systems, all tiers may offer challenging OPFOR capabilities for training. The Equipment Substitution Matrices can help force designers find weapons to substitute, to reflect those best suited for specific training scenarios.

Dismounted Infantry

System	Tier 1	Tier 2	Tier 3	Tier 4
Infantry Flame Launcher	(Shmel) RPO-M	RPO-A	RPO	LPO-50
Lt AT Disposable Launcher	Armbrust	Armbrust	Armbrust	RPG-18; M72 LAW
AT Disposable Launcher	RPG-30/32/28	RPG-27	RPG-26	RPG-22
AT Grenade Lcher (ATGL)	Panzerfaust 3-IT600	Panzerfaust 3 T-600; RPG-29	Carl Gustaf M3	RPG-7V
Long-Range ATGL	PF-98 Mounted/Tripod (@ Bn)	RPG-29 Tripod / Mounted	SPG-9M (Imp)	SPG-9
Heavy ATGM Man-Portable	Eryx SR-ATGM	Eryx SR-ATGM	M79/Type 65-1 Recoilless	M67 Recoilless Rifle
Light Auto Grenade Launcher	QLZ-87 (Light Configuration); QLZ-87B	W-87	W-87	W-87
Auto Grenade Launcher	CIS-40 w/Air-Burst Munitions/ AGS-30; QLZ-87 (Heavy Configuration)	AGS-17	AGS-17	AGS-17
Heavy Machine Gun	KORD	NSV	NSV	DShk; M2 Browning
General Purpose MG	PKM Pechneg	PKM	PKM	PKM
Anti-Materiel Rifle	[null M107A1( .50 Cal); 6S8 and 6S8-1 (12.7mm)]	M82A1( .50 Cal); OSV-96 (12.7mm)	M82A1( .50 Cal)	M82A1( .50 Cal)
Sniper Rifle	SVD	SVD	SVD	Mosin-Nagant
Assault Rifle	AK-74M	AK-74M	AKM	AKM
Carbine	AKS-74U	AKS-74U	AK-47 Krinkov	AK-47 Krinkov
Company-Dismount ATGM	Spike-LR ATGM Launcher	Spike-MR ATGM Launcher	AT-13	AT-7
Battalion-Dismount ATGMs	Kornet-E Launcher (1 team) OR Starstreak-SL AD/AT (1 team)	Kornet-E ATGM Lchr	AT-5B	AT-5

Combat Vehicles

System	Tier 1	Tier 2	Tier 3	Tier 4
Infantry Fighting Vehicle	BMP-2M Berezhok	BMP-2M	AMX-10P	BMP-1PG
Infantry IFSV for IFV	BMP-2M Berezhok	BMP-2M w/Kornet/SA-18	AMX-10 w/AT-5B/SA-16	BMP-1PG w/ AT-5/SA-16
Infantry IFV Wheeled	BTR-3E1/AT-5B	BTR-82A	BTR-80A	BTR-80
Amphibious IFV	BMP-3UAE/AT-10B	BMP-3UAE/AT-10B	BMD-2/AT-5B	BMP-1PG/AT-5
Amphibious IFV IFSV	BMP-3UAE/AT-10B	BMP-3UAE/AT-10B	BMD-2/AT-5B	BMD-1PG w/AT-5/SA-16
Armored Personnel Carrier	BTR-3E1/AT-5B	BTR-80A	BTR-80	M113A1
Amphibious APC	BTR-82A	WZ-551	BTR-80A	VTT-323
Amphibious APC IFSV	BTR-90/AT-5B/SA-24	BTR-80A w/Kornet-E/SA-18	WZ-551 w/AT-5B/SA-16	VTT-323 w/AT-3C/SA-14
Airborne IFV	BMD-3	BMD-3	BMD-2	BMD-1P
Airborne APC	BTR-D	BTR-D	BTR-D	BTR-D
Airborne APC IFSV	BTR-D w/Kornet-E, SA-24	BTR-D w/Kornet-E/SA-18	BTR-D w/AT-5B/SA-16	BTR-D w/AT-5, SA-14
Heavy IFV/Heavy IFSV	BMP-3M/w Kornet-E, SA-24	BMP-3UAE/Kornet-E, SA-18	Marder 1A1/MILAN 2, SA-16	BMP-1PG/w SA-14
Combat Recon Vehicle	BRM-3K/Kredo M1	BRM-3K	BRM-1K	EE-9
Abn/Amphib Recon CRV	BMD-3/Kredo M1	BMD-3K	BMD-1PK	BMD-1K
Armored Scout Car	BRDM-2M-98/Zbik-A	BRDM-2 M-97/Zbik-B	Fox	BRDM-2
Sensor Recon Vehicle	HJ-62C	HJ-62C	BRM-1K	BRM-1K
AT Recon Vehicle	PRP-4MU (w/Kredo-M1)	PRP-4M (w/PSNR-5M)	PRP-4 (w/PSNR-5K)	PRP-3 (w/SMALL FRED)
Armored Command Vehicle	BMP-1KshM	BMP-1KShM	BMP-1KSh	BMP-1KSh
Abn/Amphib ACV	BMD-1KShM	BMD-1KShM	BMD-1KShM	1KShM
Wheeled ACV	BTR-80/Kushetka-B	BTR-80/Kushetka-B	BTR-60PU/BTR-145BM	BTR-60PU/BTR-145BM

Tanks & Anti-Tank Vehicles

System	Tier 1	Tier 2	Tier 3	Tier 4
Main Battle Tank	T-90A/AT-11 Refleks 5km	T-72BM / AT-11 Svir 4km	Type 59-11 105mm/AT-10	T-55AMV
Amphibious Tank	Type 63A 105mm/AT-10	Type 63A 105mm	M1985 85mm/AT-3	PT-76B
Tracked Heavy Armored CV	2S25	AMX-10 PAC 90	AMX-13	M41A3
Wheeled Heavy Armored CV	Carousel 120	AMX-10RC Desert Storm	AMX 10RC	EE-9
Div ATGM Launcher Vehicle	9P157-2/Krizantema-S	9P149 w/AT-9 Ataka	9P149 w/AT-6	9P148/AT-5
Bde ATGM Veh Tracked	9P162 w/Kornet	AMX-10 HOT 3	AMX-10 HOT 2	Type 85/Red Arrow-8A
Bde ATGM Veh Wheeled	BMD-3	VBL w/Kvartet, Kornet	9P148/AT-5B	Jeep/Red Arrow-8A
Abn ATGM Launcher Veh	VBL MK2 w/Kvartet, Kornet	VBL w/Kvartet, Kornet	BMD-2 with AT-5B	BMD-1P with AT-5
Hvy ATGM Launcher Veh	9P157/Mokopa	9P149 w/Ataka	9P149 w/AT-6 9P148/AT-5
NLOS ATGM Launcher Veh	AMX-13Nimrod-3	Type 92B/Nimrod	--	--
Div Towed AT Gun	2A45MR	2A45M	MT-12	MT-12
Bde Towed AT Gun	2A45MR	MT-12R	MT-12	M40A1

Combat Support Vehicles

System	Tier 1	Tier 2	Tier 3	Tier 4
Motorcycle	Gear-Up (2-man)	Gear-Up (2-man)	Motorcycle (2-man)	Motorcycle (2-man)
Tactical Utility Vehicle	VBL MK2	VBL	UAZ-469	UAZ-469
Armored Multi-purpose	MT-LB6MB	MT-LB6MA	MT-LBu	MT-LB
All Terrain-Vehicle	Supacat	Supacat	LUAZ-967M	LUAZ-967M

Indirect Fire Systems & IDF-Related

System	Tier 1	Tier 2	Tier 3	Tier 4
Mortar/Combo Gun Tracked	2S9-1	2S9-1	2S9-1	M106A2
Mortar/Combo Gun Wheeled	2S23	2S23	2S12	M-1943
Towed Mortar or Combo Gun	Type 86 or 2B16	Type 86 or 2B16	M75 or MO-120-RT	M-1943
82-mm Mortar	Type 84	Type 84	Type 69	M-1937
82-mm Auto Mortar	2B9	2B9	2B9	2B14-1
60-mm Mortar	Type 90	Type 90	Type 63-1	Type 63-1
Towed Light Howitzer	D-30	D-30	D-30	D-30
Towed Medium How/Gun	G5	2A65	2A36	D-20
Self-Propelled Howitzer	2S19M1-155, G6, AU-F1T	G6, 2S19M1	2S3M1	2S3M
Multiple Rocket Launcher	9A51/Prima	9A51/Prima	BM-21-1	BM-21
Light MRL/Vehicle Mount	Type 63-1	Type 63-1	Type 63-1	Type 63
Heavy MRL	9A52-2 and 9P140	9A52-2 and 9P140	9P140	Fadjr-3
1-Round Rocket Launcher	9P132	9P132	9P132	9P132
Amphibious SP How	2S1M	2S1M	2S1	2S1
Artillery Cmd Recon Veh	1V13M w/1D15, 1V119	1V13M w/1D15, 1V119	1V13, 1V119	1V18/19, 1V110
ACRV, Wheeled	1V152, 1V110	1V152, 1V119, 1V110	1V119, 1V110	1V18/19, 1V110
Mobile Recon Vehicle	PRP-4MU (w/Kredo-M1)	PRP-4M (w/PSNR-5M)	PRP-4 (w/PSNR-5K)	PRP-3 (w/SMALL FRED)
Arty Locating Radar	1L-259U, 1L-219	1L-220U, 1L-219	ARK-1M	Cymbeline
Sound Ranging System	SORAS 6	SORAS 6	AZK-7	AZK-5
Flame Weapon	TOS-1	TOS-1	Type 762 MRL	OT-55 Flame Tank

Reconnaissance

System	Tier 1	Tier 2	Tier 3	Tier 4
Ground Surveillance Radar	Kredo-1E	Kredo-M1	PSNR-5M/Kredo-M	PSNR-5/TALL MIKE/Kredo
Man-portable Radar	FARA-1E	FARA-1E	N/A	N/A
Unattended Ground Sensors	BSA Digital Net	BSA Digital Net	N/A	N/A
Remote TV/IR Monitor	Sirene IR	Sosna	N/A	N/A
Thermal Night Viewer	Sophie LR	Sophie/NVG 2 Gen II	NVG 2 Gen II	NVG 1Gen II
Laser Target Designator	DHY-307	DHY-307	1D15
Laser Rangefinder/Gonio-meter Fire Control System	Vector/SG12 with Sophie-LR	Vector/SG12 with Sophie	PAB-2M	PAB-2

Engineer Systems

System	Tier 1	Tier 2	Tier 3	Tier 4
Wheeled Minelaying Systems	PMZ-4	PMR-3	Istrice VS-MTLU-1
Tracked Minelaying Systems	GMZ-3	GMZ-2	GMZ
Scatterable Mine Systems	PKM Man-Portable Minelayer	UMZ	Istrice VS-MTLU-1	--
Route Recon Systems	IPR	IRM	--	--
Route Clearing Systems	IMR-2M	IMR-2	BAT-2	BAT-M
Bridging Systems	TMM	PMP Pontoon Bridge	MT-55A	--

Electronic Warfare

System	Tier 1	Tier 2	Tier 3	Tier 4
Ground-Based ESM	Meerkat-S	Weasel 2000	MCS90 Tamara	R-703/709
Ground-Based EA	CICADA-C	TRC 274	Pelena-6	R-330 T/B
TACSAT EA	CICADA-R	GSY 1800	Liman P2	R-934B
Radar EA	BOQ-X300	CBJ-40 Bome	Pelena-1	SPN-2/4
GPS EA	Aviaconversia TDS	Optima III	Aviaconversia	--
UAV-Based EA	Fox TX/Barrage	ASN-207/JN-1102	Yastreb-2MB/AJ-045A	Muecke/Hummel

Communications

System	Tier 1	Tier 2	Tier 3	Tier 4
Radio VHF, Hand-Held	Panther-P	TRC5102	ACH42	R31K
Radio, SPF	Scimitar-H	PRC138	PVS5300	PRC104
Radio VHF, Veh Medium Pwr	Panther	Jaguar-V	R163-50U	R173M
Radio HF/VHF, Veh Med Pwr	M3TR	RF5000	XK2000	R123M
Satellite Systems	Syracuse-III	Feng Huo-1	Mayak	Molinya 1
Global Navigation Sattellite	NAVSTAR	GLONASS	Beidou	Galileo
Operational Comms	RL402A	R423-1	KSR8	R161-5
Tac Wide Area Network	EriTac	RITA	N/A	N/A
IBMS Network	Pakistani IBMS	Pakistani IBMS	N/A	N/A