Chapter 9: Indirect Fire Support

Modern battle is, above all, a firefight⎯in which indirect fire plays a decisive role in the effective engagement of the enemy. Uninterrupted and very close  cooperation with the maneuver of supported combined arms units is the basis of the actions of indirect fire support units.

Fire Support Concepts

Fire support is the collective and coordinated use of target acquisition, indirect fire weapons, and aircraft, integrated with other lethal and nonlethal means, to engage enemy forces in support of a battle plan. The goal is to synchronize all available fire support systems to achieve the most effective results, thereby maximizing combat power. Effective fire support enables OPFOR ground forces to attack successfully and quickly to exploit weaknesses. Commanders try to accomplish their missions using a combination of maneuver, fires, and information warfare (INFOWAR).

The OPFOR stresses that fire support should combine air assets, surface-to-surface missiles (SSMs), and artillery into an integrated attack of enemy targets throughout the area of responsibility (AOR). The combined arms commander always seeks to increase the effectiveness of air and missile strikes and artillery fire to destroy enemy formations, weapon systems, or key components of an enemy’s combat system. (See Systems Warfare later in this chapter and in chapter 1.) This ensures continuous fire support for maneuver units throughout the AOR.

The OPFOR believes that fire support must be integrated with INFOWAR. INFOWAR provides a nonlethal alternative or supplement to attack by fire and maneuver. It is integrated into the overall concept of the battle, to confuse, deceive, delay, disrupt, disable, and disorganize the enemy at all levels. Fire support can play a role in the physical destruction element of INFOWAR.

The integration of air, artillery, SSM, and nonlethal assets into a unified fire support plan is a major task for the combined arms commander. Integration is a decisive element, fundamental to the success of any tactical action on the modern battlefield. The OPFOR does not consider itself to be an artillery-centric force. Rather, it views itself as using various forms of fire support to achieve success during offensive and defensive combat. In the offense, fire support is important to the success of any attack. It can destroy key enemy systems; disrupt, immobilize, or destroy enemy groupings; and repel counterattacks. Fire support is also the cornerstone of any defense, blunting attacks at the crucial point in the battle. It disrupts enemy preparations for the attack and repels forces.

Fire Support Principles

The principles of fire support are the framework for a thought process that ensures the most effective use of fire support assets. These principles apply at all levels of command, regardless of the specific fire support assets available:

• Plan early and continuously.
• Exploit all available reconnaissance, intelligence, surveillance, and target acquisition (RISTA) assets.
• Consider airspace management and the use of all fire support (lethal and nonlethal) means.
• Use the lowest level of command capable of furnishing effective support.
• Avoid unnecessary duplication of effort.
• Use the most effective means to accomplish the mission.
• Provide rapid and effective coordination.
• Provide for flexibility of employment.
• Provide for safeguarding and survivability of OPFOR fire support assets.
• Attempt to achieve surprise when possible.
• Deliver highly accurate and effective fire.
• Integrate fire support with maneuver and INFOWAR at all levels.

Systems Warfare

The foundation of OPFOR planning is the systems warfare approach to combat. Thus, the OPFOR analyzes its own combat system and how it can use the combined effects of this “system of systems” to degrade or destroy the enemy’s combat system. In systems warfare, the subsystems or components of a combat system are targeted and destroyed individually. Once a favorable combat situation has developed, the targeted enemy subsystem is quickly destroyed in high-intensity battle, thus making the enemy’s overall combat system vulnerable to destruction or at least degrading its effectiveness. (See Systems Warfare in chapter 1 for further information.)

Within the systems warfare approach, the OPFOR employs a fire support concept centered on a phased cycle consisting of—

• Finding a critical component of the enemy’s combat system and determining its location with RISTA assets.
• Engaging it with precision fires, maneuver, or other means.
• Recovering to support the fight against another part of the enemy force.

The primary reason for attacking an enemy with fires is to destroy one or more key components of the enemy’s combat system and/or to create favorable conditions for destroying other parts of his combat system.

Techniques to Exploit Enemy Vulnerabilities

The OPFOR seeks to avoid its enemy’s strengths and exploits his vulnerabilities. When the OPFOR is operating from a position of relative strategic weakness, it seeks to tactically outmaneuver, overwhelm, and outpace the enemy. It also seeks to deny the enemy any sanctuary on the battlefield, as well as in the local theater or in his strategic depth.

The OPFOR will use all fire support means (primarily aviation, SSMs, and long-range rocket strikes) to attack targets in the homeland of an opponent in the region. In a strategic campaign, the OPFOR may use various fire support assets in access-limitation operations and attack of the enemy’s lines of communications and rear. It will attack the most vulnerable parts of the enemy’s combat system. This includes strikes on the infrastructure and even civilian targets. Such OPFOR attacks will be coordinated with perception management efforts to convey the view that these terror tactics are no worse than enemy bombing campaigns.

The OPFOR will also leverage the effects of its available fire support means by integrating them into an integrated fires command (IFC) in organizations down to division or division tactical group (DTG) level. The IFC (described in detail later in this chapter) synchronizes and focuses the efforts of RISTA and fire to destroy key enemy formations or systems⎯or key components of an enemy’s  combat system. Destroying such targets can not only shift the balance of combat power in the OPFOR’s favor, but also undermine enemy morale and resolve.

Target Damage Criteria

Target damage is the effect of fires on a given military target. It results in total, partial, or temporary loss  of  the  target’s  combat  effectiveness. The OPFOR categories of target  damage are annihilation, demolition, neutralization, and harassment. Of these categories, the first three fall under the general term destruction.

Annihilation

Annihilation fires render targets completely combat-ineffective and incapable of reconstruction or token resistance. For a point target such as an antitank guided missile launcher, the OPFOR must expend enough munitions to ensure a 70 to 90 percent probability of kill. For area targets such as platoon strong points or artillery firing positions, the OPFOR must fire enough rounds to destroy from 50 to 60 percent of the targets within the group. These fires result in the group ceasing to exist as a viable fighting force.

Demolition

The OPFOR uses the term demolition in reference to the destruction of buildings and engineer works (such as bridges, fortifications, or roads). Demolition requires enough munitions to make such material objects unfit for further use.

Neutralization

Fire for neutralization inflicts enough losses on a target to—

• Cause it to temporarily lose its combat effectiveness, or
• Restrict or prohibit its maneuver, or
• Disrupt its command and control (C2) capability.

To achieve neutralization, the OPFOR must deliver enough munitions to destroy 30 percent of a group of unobserved targets. The expectation is that the target is severely damaged but could again become capable of coordinated resistance after the fire is lifted. The term neutralization applies only in an artillery context.

Harassment

The OPFOR uses a limited number of fire support systems and munitions within a prescribed time to deliver harassment fires. The goal of these fires is to put psychological pressure on enemy personnel in locations such as defensive positions, command posts (CPs), and logistics installations. Successful harassment fire inhibits maneuver, lowers morale, interrupts rest, and weakens enemy combat readiness.

---

Note. The OPFOR carefully calculates fire support requirements in terms of weapons and munitions needed to produce a required effect on enemy targets. If insufficient fire support or ammunition is available to achieve the necessary result, the OPFOR does not fire less and hope for the best. Rather, if necessary, it engages fewer targets, adjusting the tactical, or even operational, fire support plan.

---

Indirect Fire Support Weapons

In addition to aviation means (discussed in chapter 10), OPFOR indirect fire support weapons consist of mortars, cannon systems, multiple rocket launchers (MRLs), and SSMs. These systems can be either towed or self-propelled.

• Mortars. All OPFOR infantry, motorized infantry, and mechanized infantry battalions contain constituent 120-mm mortars. Smaller mortars are also available. Guerrilla and other organizations may have them as well.
• Cannon systems. Cannon artillery includes field guns, howitzers, and hybrid systems.
• Multiple rocket launchers. The OPFOR categorizes MRLs as medium-caliber (100- up to 220- mm) and as large-caliber (220-mm and larger).
• Surface-to-surface missiles. SSMs include tactical- through strategic-level ballistic missiles and land-attack cruise missiles using warheads ranging from conventional to nuclear.

For additional information on indirect fire support weapons and available ammunition types, see the Worldwide Equipment Guide. For information on these  weapons  in  OPFOR  organizations, see FM 7-100.4.

The majority of OPFOR artillery (152-mm and above) and large-caliber MRLs are capable of firing nuclear munitions. The majority of artillery and MRL units can fire chemical munitions. However, only select units will be issued the nuclear or chemical munitions. Nevertheless, continued improvements in conventional munitions, especially precision munitions, increase the likelihood that the OPFOR can achieve operational- or tactical-level fire superiority at the desired location and time without resorting to CBRN weapons.

Command and Control

OPFOR tactical fire support is designed to be controlled at the lowest possible level. This ensures flexibility, survivability and the proper level of support to the tactical commander. OPFOR commanders allocate fire support assets and means to subordinates in direct correlation to their need based on the scheme of maneuver. The OPFOR does not retain assets at a higher level simply to preserve flexibility at that level. If a subordinate needs an asset to accomplish a mission, every effort is made to ensure he has it.

Command and Support Relationships

Units that provide indirect fire support for maneuver units may have one of three command and support relationships: constituent, dedicated, or supporting:

• Commanders of indirect fire support units in a subordinate (constituent or dedicated) status report directly to the commander of the maneuver unit or IFC to which they are subordinate. Units in a dedicated status continue to receive logistics support from their parent indirect fire support headquarters.
• Commanders of indirect fire support units in a supporting status are commanded by their parent organization but receive missions from their supported headquarters for the duration of the relationship.

See chapter 2 for detailed discussion of command and support relationships.

Integrated Fires Command

The IFC is a combination of a standing C2 structure and a task organization of constituent and dedicated fire support units. All division-level and above OPFOR organizations possess an IFC C2 structure⎯staff, CP, communications and intelligence architecture, and automated fire control  system (AFCS). The IFC exercises C2 of all subordinate (constituent and dedicated) indirect fire support assets retained by its level of command. This includes army aviation, artillery, and SSM units. It also exercises C2 over all RISTA assets allocated to it.

---

Note. Based on mission requirements, the division or DTG commander may also allocate maneuver forces to the IFC commander. This is most often done when he chooses to use the IFC CP to provide C2 for a strike (see chapters 1 and 3). However, it can also be done for the execution of other missions. One possibility would be for the IFC CP to command the disruption force, the exploitation force, or any other functional force whose actions must be closely coordinated with fires delivered by the IFC.

---

In combat, the IFC forms the framework for the C2 of indirect fires in the division or DTG. A division or DTG always has an IFC, even if it receives no additional fire support units during task-organizing. There is one IFC per division or DTG, to support the tactical battle plan. However, each IFC is capable of engaging designated operational and strategic targets, if necessary.

The division or DTG deputy commander (DC) is the IFC commander. Through his IFC commander, the division or DTG commander exercises C2 over fire support and associated RISTA assets retained in the IFC. The following procedures apply to this process:

• The division or DTG commander specifies the organization of forces for combat and the tasks for indirect fire support assets.
• The IFC commander conducts and coordinates fire support planning. He also coordinates with the division or DTG chief of reconnaissance and the reconnaissance subsection for targeting data.

The IFC commander can also control (but not command) fire support and RISTA assets allocated to the division or DTG in a supporting relationship. He can give them mission priorities, but they are still commanded by their parent organization.

Fire support assets that are allocated to a DTG and not used in the IFC are allocated, in a constituent or dedicated relationship, to subordinate brigade tactical groups (BTGs). Fire support units remaining under IFC command may provide fires for maneuver brigades or BTGs in a supporting relationship. The supporting relationship allows the IFC commander the flexibility to task fire support assets to engage key enemy targets throughout the AOR.

The number and type of fire support and RISTA units allocated to an IFC is mission-dependent. The IFC is not organized according to a table of organization and equipment, but is task-organized to accomplish the missions assigned. Figure 9-1 shows the possible components of an IFC at DTG level.

The mission of the IFC is to execute all fire support tasks required to accomplish the division or DTG mission. It is designed to⎯

• Exploit the combat power inherent in carefully integrated ground and air fire support actions.
• Reduce to the absolute minimum the amount of time from target acquisition to engagement.
• Permit  fire support assets  to mass  their effects  without having  to operate  in concentrated formations.
• Ensure the optimal fire support asset(s) are assigned any given mission.
• Ensure adherence to the commander’s priorities for fire support.
• Integrate the effects of fires from units placed in support of the division or DTG.
• Act, if necessary, as the division’s or DTG’s alternate command structure.

IFC Headquarters

The IFC headquarters component is composed of the IFC commander and his command section, a RISTA and INFOWAR section, an operations section, and an integrated support section. (See figure 9-2.) The DC of the division or DTG serves as IFC commander. The RISTA and INFOWAR section provides the complete spectrum of intelligence support to the IFC as well as INFOWAR support for the headquarters component. The operations section provides the control, coordination, and communications for the headquarters component. Located within the operations section is the fire support coordination center (FSCC). The integrated support section provides control and coordination of various support functions. The IFC headquarters relies principally on direct liaison among subordinate units to ensure the necessary coordination of fire support. A division’s standing IFC headquarters should also be capable of exercising C2 over additional assets allocated to augment the IFC in a DTG.

---

Note. A division or DTG will still retain a core IFC headquarters, even if it loses its originally subordinate fire support assets to another command during task-organizing. This facilitates C2 of any fire support assets that might be reallocated to that division or DTG during some subsequent phase of combat.

---

Artillery Component

The artillery component is a task organization tailored for the conduct of artillery support during combat. In a division IFC, it consists of all assets of the division’s artillery brigade that are not allocated in a constituent or dedicated relationship to subordinate maneuver brigades. In a DTG, it is organized around—

• Assets of the artillery brigade of the division that served as the basis for the DTG (except for assets suballocated for the task organization of subordinate maneuver brigades).
• Any additional artillery units that are allocated to the DTG and remain subordinate to the DTG in a constituent or dedicated relationship rather than being further suballocated to subordinates.

Such additional assets usually come to the DTG through the operational-strategic command (OSC), when the OSC decided not to retain them at its own level of command. The artillery component includes appropriate target acquisition, C2, and logistics support assets.

The number of artillery battalions assigned to an IFC varies according such factors as mission of friendly units, the enemy situation, and terrain. However, the number of artillery units also can vary based on the capabilities of the supporting AFCS. For example, an MRL brigade AFCS can have enough command and staff vehicles for the brigade commander and his chief of staff, as well as the subordinate commanders of battalions and up to 18 batteries (6 battalions). An AFCS supporting a cannon, MRL, or mortar battalion may consist of enough command and staff vehicles to support 3 to 4 batteries (each consisting of 4 to 8 systems).

Army Aviation Component

The army aviation component is a task organization tailored for the conduct of tactical-level aviation missions. It is a flexible and balanced air combat organization capable of providing air support to the DTG commander. It includes attack aviation capability as well as requisite ground and air service support assets. The IFC commander exercises control through facilities provided by the airspace operations subsection of the DTG staff and/or the army aviation unit(s).

Missile Component

The missile component is a task organization consisting of long-range missiles or rockets capable of delivering conventional or CBRN munitions. It is organized around an SSM or rocket battalion or brigade and includes the appropriate logistics support assets. An OSC may or may not allocate SSMs or rockets to support a DTG IFC in a constituent or dedicated relationship.

Long-Range Reconnaissance Component

The long-range reconnaissance (LRR) component normally consists of assets from the division’s constituent LRR company. Personnel of this company are specially trained for insertion in small reconnaissance teams at distances up to 100 km from the rest of the division. An OSC may allocate additional LRR assets to the DTG, if the OSC has received such units from the administrative force structure (AFS).

The LRR component provides the OPFOR the ability to reconnoiter and attack enemy forces throughout their tactical depth. The LRR assets conduct actions to achieve tactical objectives. Such actions may have either long-range or immediate impact on the enemy. The OPFOR concept of LRR missions includes reconnaissance, direct action, and diversionary measures.

If an OSC has received special-purpose forces (SPF) units, it may further allocate some of these units to supplement the LRR assets a DTG has in its IFC. However, the scarce SPF assets normally would remain at OSC level. Even when allocated to a DTG, probably in a supporting status, the SPF would pursue tactical goals in support of operational objectives. SPF are trained for missions similar to those of the LRR company, but may be inserted to even greater distances.

Integrated Support Group

The integrated support group (ISG) is a compilation of units performing logistics tasks that support the IFC. Other combat support and combat service support units may be grouped in this component for organizational efficiency although they may support only one of the major units of the IFC. For a DGT IFC, the ISG typically is a task-organized composite of division-level units and other units suballocated from the OSC. The ISG is discussed in detail in chapter 14.

Chief of Integrated Fires

Within the operations section of the division or DTG staff, there is a chief of integrated fires. This officer is responsible for coordinating and advising the commander on the effective integration of C2 and RISTA means with fire support means (including precision fires) to support the overall battle plan. He controls, but does not command, the fire support units subordinate to or supporting the division or DTG. He advises the division or DTG commander on how best to use available fire support assets.

Chief of Fire Support Coordination

On the staff of a maneuver brigade or BTG, there is an officer responsible for planning and coordinating indirect fire support. At this level, his title is chief of fire support coordination (CFSC). The CFSC controls, but does not command, the indirect fire support units subordinate to or supporting his maneuver unit. He advises the maneuver commander on how best to use available fire support assets. The CFSC heads the fire support coordination element of the functional staff.

Fire Support Coordination Center

An FSCC is established at each organizational level from maneuver brigade to IFC. The FSCC is the staff element responsible for the planning and coordination of fires to support the respective maneuver unit. It performs the following battle coordination functions:

• Acquire and identify high-payoff targets (HPTs).
• Recommend targets.
• Use target value analysis to identify target priorities.
• Determine fire support needs.
• Expedite fire support.
• Assess fire support effects.
• Change fire support plans.
• Coordinate the timing of fire support attacks (sometimes in support of INFOWAR objectives).
• Recommend the use of aviation.

The FSCC also disseminates information on fire support to commanders and staffs of maneuver forces and/or aviation units operating in the same AOR, in order to reduce potential conflicts. This information includes firing positions, targeted areas, and fire support plans.

Brigade-Level Fire Support

The brigade or BTG command group consists of the commander, DC, and chief of staff, and functional staff. The primary difference is that the DC does not serve as IFC commander, since there is no IFC at this level of command. At this level, there is also no chief of integrated fires in the operations section of the staff; instead, there is a CFSC.

A brigade that does not receive augmentation has whatever fire support unit was constituent to the brigade in the AFS. The constituent fire support is directly under the C2 of the brigade commander, who is advised by his CFSC and the FSCC in the operations section of his staff.

A brigade that becomes a BTG may receive additional fire support units (artillery, SSMs, or army aviation) in a constituent or dedicated relationship. Each of these additional units, along with whatever fire support unit was originally constituent to the base brigade in the AFS, is under the direct C2 of the BTG commander, advised by his CFSC and FSCC. However, it is possible that the BTG’s higher command may have reallocated some or all of the base brigade’s original fire support assets to some other subordinate during the task-organizing of its fighting force structure.

Any brigade or BTG may also receive one or more additional fire support units allocated to it in a supporting relationship. In this case, the supporting fire support unit(s) remain under the command of their parent headquarters (be that a fire support headquarters in some higher command’s IFC or some higher headquarters remaining in its original status from the AFS). The supporting unit may or may not be located in the supported brigade’s or BTG’s AOR. However, the supported brigade or BTG commander can give mission priorities to these supporting fire support units and (if the supporting units are in his AOR) position these assets to carry out such missions.

Fire Support Below Brigade Level

A brigade or BTG can allocate some of its constituent or dedicated indirect fire support assets to a maneuver battalion in a constituent or dedicated relationship—in which case the battalion would become a detachment. More commonly, however, the brigade or BTG could employ some of its constituent or dedicated fire support units (or parts of units) to provide fire support for a particular battalion or detachment in a supporting relationship.

A maneuver battalion staff does not include an FSCC or a functional staff with a fire support coordination element. Nevertheless, there is still a chief of fire support coordination (CFSC) responsible for that function. The maneuver battalion’s assistant operations officer functions as the CFSC in those units (such as a tank battalion) that do not have a mortar battery but still require fire support. Otherwise, the commander of the mortar battery also serves as the CFSC. The mortar battery headquarters contains a fire control section to coordinate battalion fires. (See FM 7-100.4.)

Fire Requests

Requests for supporting fires may originate at any organizational level. They are initiated when one or more of the following conditions exist:

• Constituent or dedicated fire support means at that level are fully engaged.
• The target is beyond the range of constituent or dedicated fire support means.
• The constituent or dedicated fire support means have suffered combat loss.

There are two methods of requesting supporting fires. (The following explanation illustrates how these methods work when a brigade or BTG requests fires from division or DTG level.) The preferred method is for the request to be forwarded from the brigade or BTG commander to the integrated fires subsection in the division or DTG headquarters. An alternate method is for the brigade or BTG commander to request supporting fires from the division or DTG commander. The division or DTG commander either approves or denies the request. If the request is approved, the division or DTG commander tasks the IFC to provide the requested support.

Naval Fire Support

Naval fire support, when available, is not allocated to a DTG as part of its IFC, since a DTG is not a joint command. Rather, naval assets may be allocated to an IFC at OSC or theater level. Naval fire support (which includes shipborne gunfire and sea-launched cruise missiles) can give the OSC commander another means of long-range indirect fires. A division or DTG (or a separate brigade or BTG) can request naval fire support through OSC channels.

A theater or OSC that receives naval fire support assets in a constituent or dedicated relationship may further allocate such naval assets to a division or DTG in a supporting relationship. However, such naval assets remain under the command of the theater- or OSC-level IFC.

Another option is for naval fire support assets to remain under the command of the Navy but to provide support for ground operations. During the course of such a supporting relationship, if enemy actions threaten naval operations, the target attack priorities of the ship may cause it to suspend or cancel land fire missions. Once the threats have subsided, the fire support assets resume their support of the ground maneuver force.

A naval fire support liaison team augments the operations section of the division- or DTG-level IFC staff when naval fire support is required to support a ground maneuver force, even in a supporting relationship. The liaison team provides special staff representation and advice on naval fire support to the IFC commander. Additionally, it coordinates requests for naval fire support and operates the naval fire support nets in the IFC FSCC.

Members of the naval fire support liaison team are specially trained in the conduct of naval gunfire. However, the observer procedures are simplified and standardized so that any observer from the supported ground force unit can effectively adjust the fires of a supporting naval vessel with a minimum of additional training.

Control of Fire Support Observers

The FSCC has three control options available to it when monitoring observers’ requests for fire. (See figure 9-3 on page 9-14 for various methods of reporting targets for attack, starting from the point of detection by a human observer or other sensor.) After considering the tactical mission, the degree of training of the observers, and the availability of fire support assets, the FSCC determines which option is best suited for the mission.

Decentralized Option

The observer may call for fire from any fire support assets available to support the mission. This is the most responsive request, but allows the FSCC the least amount of control. Since the observer is allowed to determine which asset should engage each target, this option generally requires a highly trained observer.

Predesignated Option

The observer is assigned a particular fire asset from which he may request support, and he operates on that fire unit’s radio net. If the observer thinks that the target requires a different fire support asset, he must request permission from the FSCC to change assets. Permission is granted on a case-by-case basis. Under this option, fire support is highly responsive, if the FSCC determines that the asset is suitable to the type of target.

Centralized Option

The observer must contact the FSCC for each call for fire. Then the FSCC refers the observer, or relays his request, to an appropriate fire support asset. This option is the least responsive for the observer but offers the highest degree of control to the FSCC. This option is generally used when a maneuver commander acts as an observer.

Tailoring

Since the level of training and the tactical situation vary for each observer, the FSCC may assign the appropriate option to each supported unit. For example—

• An SPF or reconnaissance unit may be predesignated.
• A maneuver unit may be centralized.
• An observer from an indirect fire support unit may be decentralized.

Fire Support Planning

Fire support planning is the determination of the content, manner, and sequence of delivery of fire on the enemy in a battle or operation. The fire support planning process includes—

• Target acquisition.
• Requirements for allocation of weapons and units (task-organizing of forces for combat).
• Assignment of tactical fire support missions to IFCs, units, and weapons.
• The manner and procedure of delivery of fire during the performance of missions.
• Determination of ammunition requirements by missions.
• Organization of coordination and C2.
• Preparation of appropriately detailed fire support plans at various levels.

In the OPFOR’s “top-down” approach to the planning and allocation of indirect fire support, fire support planning occurs at the highest level possible. The IFC commander at the OSC and division or DTG levels or the CFSC at brigade or BTG level plans and coordinates indirect fire support, always under the direction of the maneuver commander. The highest level of participating units coordinates and approves the fire support plan, with input from subordinate units. OSC and division or DTG headquarters perform general fire support planning. Detailed planning occurs in maneuver brigades or BTGs, IFCs, and indirect fire support units. The fires of all indirect fire support units within a brigade or BTG are incorporated into the brigade or BTG fire support plan. In turn, brigade or BTG fire support plans become part of division or DTG fire support plans. Division or DTG fire support plans become part of OSC fire support plans.

In its simplest form, fire support planning is the process of determining the best way to engage all of the enemy’s units with fires. It must ensure that the required level of damage is inflicted in a manner consistent with the commander’s concept of the battle. Above all else, this means that the fire support plan must match his concept for the sequence in which the battle will develop. The focus of fire support planning is on establishing and maintaining fire superiority over the enemy. Therefore, timing is critical.

Estimate of Situation

The planning process begins with an estimate of the situation. This estimate includes consideration of the following:

• The scheme of maneuver of supported forces.
• The enemy force to receive fire.
• The locations and types of individual targets within the designated enemy force.
• The required or desired level of target damage.
• Fire support assets available, both delivery systems and ordnance.

The commander of an indirect fire support unit at any level coordinates the fires under his control. He determines new requirements and missions and, with the IFC commander or brigade CFSC, makes suggestions to the maneuver commander about adjustments in tactical organization as the situation develops.

IFC Planning

The division or DTG commander, his IFC commander, and other staff members establish the basis for fire support planning during the commander’s reconnaissance of the area of anticipated action. During this reconnaissance, the commander refines the organization of forces for combat and the means of coordination. The division or DTG commander gives the IFC commander the information base to determine the following:

• Targets for indirect fire weapons to engage and fire upon.
• Priority of each target.
• Sequence in which to attack targets.
• Time to attack each target.

An IFC commander and members of his staff conduct their planning in coordination with the rest of the division or DTG staff, concurrently with developing the battle plan. Planning considerations include target type, dimensions, degree of protection, mobility, and range to the target.

Fire Support Coordination Measures

Fires pose a potential hazard to friendly maneuver forces and aircraft activities. (See chapter 10 for more information on air and artillery coordination measures.) To reduce potential conflicts  between indirect fires and maneuver forces or aircraft, information pertaining to firing positions, targeted areas, and fire support plans is distributed to commanders and their staffs. The fire support plan includes a map with graphics outlining the following control lines:

• Coordinated fire line. A line beyond which indirect fire systems can fire at any time within the AOR of the establishing headquarters without additional coordination.
• Final coordination line. A line established by the appropriate maneuver commander to ensure coordination of fire of converging friendly forces. It can be used to prohibit fires or the effects of fires across the line without coordination with the affected force. For example, this line may be used during linkup operations between an airborne or heliborne insertion and converging ground forces.
• Joint fire line. A line established by the appropriate OSC-level and above commander to ensure coordination of fire not under his control but which may affect his operations. The joint fire line is used to coordinate fires of air, ground, or sea weapons systems using various types of ammunition against surface targets.
• Safety line. A line that denotes the fragmentation footprint of indirect fire munitions or of bombs or rockets released from aircraft. This indicates the minimum distance between the impact area and the nearest friendly troops.

Assigning Fire Missions

When assigning missions, indirect fire support commanders and planners consider several factors, depending on the situation. These factors include⎯

• Type of target (for example, equipment or personnel, deliberate or hasty defensive positions, hard- or soft-skinned vehicles, point or area targets).
• Deployment of target (dug-in or in the open).
• Whether the target is stationary or moving.
• Whether the target is under direct observation during an artillery attack.
• Range to the target.
• Type, caliber, and number of weapons engaging the target.
• Types of ammunition available.
• Time available to prepare for firing.

Targeting

Targeting (selecting and prioritizing targets) requires constant interaction between maneuver, reconnaissance, fire support, and INFOWAR at all levels. Target value analysis is an analytical tool that is used in the targeting process by which the supported maneuver commander⎯

• Provides focus for his target acquisition effort.
• Identifies priorities for the engagement of enemy targets that will facilitate the success of his mission.
• Identifies the target damage criteria.
• Permits planning for identified contingencies based on enemy options available when the enemy operation fails.

Target Analysis

Target analysis is the examination of potential targets to determine military importance, priority for attack, and weapons required to obtain a desired level of damage or casualties. Targets are not attacked indiscriminately but are part of an overall scheme or plan to destroy an enemy complex. A target complex is a series of interrelated or dependent target elements that together serve a common function. The target could also be part of the infrastructure or a particular part of the enemy’s combat system.

The OPFOR considers the following five factors for selection of targets in a particular target complex:

• Criticality.
• Vulnerability.
• Accessibility.
• Recoverability.
• Effect on the local population.

The FSCC uses diagrams, maps, photographs, and other intelligence to analyze a target complex and select targets for attack that offer maximum timeliness and effect. The analysis enables the IFC or maneuver commander to select the appropriate system or mechanism to conduct an attack. Some of the simplest operations can either cause or create favorable conditions for great damage to the enemy.

High-Value and High-Payoff Targets

High-value targets (HVTs) are assets the enemy commander requires for the successful completion of his mission. High-payoff targets (HPTs) are whose loss to the enemy will significantly contribute to the success of the OPFOR mission. While target value is usually the greatest factor contributing to the target payoff, other considerations include the following:

• Sequence or order of occurrence.
• Ability to locate and identify the target.
• Degree of accuracy and identification available from the acquisition system.
• Ability to engage and defeat the target in accordance with the established target damage criteria.
• Resource requirements necessary to accomplish all of the above.

The loss of HVTs or HPTs would be expected to seriously degrade the effectiveness of the enemy’s combat system.

Based on a battlefield analysis, the maneuver commander, with advice from his IFC commander or CFSC, selects HVTs and HPTs and establishes a prioritized list of them. The list identifies the targets for a specific point in the battle in the order of their priority for acquisition and attack.

Time-Sensitive Targets

Time-sensitive targets are those targets requiring an immediate response. The reason for the urgency is that they either pose (or will soon pose) a clear and present danger to the OPFOR or are highly lucrative, fleeting targets of opportunity.

Target Attack Methodology

The vast array of targets anticipated on the battlefield can generate competing demands for fire support. These demands could exceed the capability of fire support assets to adequately respond to all requirements. Critical to the success of OPFOR combat actions is the ability to plan, detect, deliver, and assess fire (in accordance with the commander’s target damage criteria) against targets throughout the AOR. Therefore, the OPFOR uses the target attack methodology of plan, detect, deliver, and assess.

Plan

The plan phase provides the focus and priorities for the reconnaissance collection management and fire planning process. It employs an estimate of enemy intent, capabilities, and vulnerabilities in conjunction with an understanding of the OPFOR mission and concept of battle. During the plan phase, the maneuver commander, with advice from his IFC commander or CFSC, makes a determination of—

• What HVTs and HPTs to look for.
• When and where they are likely to appear on the battlefield.
• Who (reconnaissance or target acquisition assets) can locate them.
• How the targets should be attacked.

Detect

During the detect phase, the reconnaissance plan is executed. As specified targets are located, the appropriate command and observation post (COP), fire control post, or delivery system is notified to initiate the attack of the target.

Figure 9-3 illustrates the varying methods of reporting targets for attack from the point of detection by a sensor through delivery. The figure displays the methods along a range from the least to the most responsive.

Deliver

The deliver phase is rapidly executed by having designated attack systems respond to the maneuver commander’s guidance when HVTs or HPTs are observed. Timely, accurate delivery is the culmination of synchronized fire support.

Assess

Following the attack of the target, RISTA assets are cued to determine if the target has been defeated in accordance with the established target damage criteria. If it is determined that the target damage criteria are not achieved, delivery assets re-engage the target until the desired target damage has been achieved.

Target Acquisition and Reconnaissance

Indirect fire target acquisition is the process of detecting, identifying, and locating elements of the enemy to be engaged. This includes acquiring enemy mortar, cannon, and rocket units with sufficient accuracy, reliability, and responsiveness for counterfire and counterbattery fire to be directed against the enemy unit. Advances in RISTA and fire control systems provide the OPFOR a capability to rapidly disseminate information on suspected enemy targets within one minute or less. This includes the time from acquisition to firing data computation and the initial transmission of data to a firing battery.

RISTA Assets

The following are some examples of RISTA assets that can provide target information for indirect fires:

• Weapon-locating radars. Detect targets following a ballistic path.
• Sound ranging. Determine the precise location of hostile artillery by using data from the sound of its guns, mortars, or rockets firing. A series of microphones capture the sound. A computer factors the intersection of the bearings and provides the location of the firing unit.
• Battlefield surveillance radars. Detect enemy activity or observe point targets to detect movements. They can detect and recognize moving targets including personnel, vehicles, watercraft, and low-flying aircraft and determine accurate locations (azimuth and range) of such targets. These radars can confirm targets sensed by other types of sensors or be used to cue other sensors and weapons. They can also determine the effectiveness of the attack on a target.
• Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Provide increased range and offer increased accuracy and responsiveness depending on the sensor suite chosen. The OPFOR has UAVs from strategic to company and specialized team level.
• Visual observation. Human intelligence (HUMINT) may consist of observation posts (OPs), artillery reconnaissance patrols, SPF, or tip-offs from maneuver elements or others. HUMINT may also include information from sympathetic or affiliated civilians or guerrillas.

For information on the systems see the Worldwide Equipment Guide. Figure 9-3 on page 9-14 describes various methods of reporting targets for attack, starting from the point of detection by a human observer or other sensor.

Observation Posts

The OPFOR uses an extensive system of OPs to provide fire support to the maneuver forces. These OPs are mobile in order to accompany rapidly moving forces. They may be in wheeled or tracked vehicles, or in the air. The configuration depends upon the level of command and the type of units.

After establishing a functional OP, scout observers can construct a deception OP to confuse the enemy about the actual position of the OP. Figure 9-4 on page 9-16 shows an example of the deployment of some of the most common types of OPs discussed below. Other vehicles serve as fire control posts and mobile reconnaissance posts (MRPs). Artillery commanders can also send out artillery reconnaissance patrols.

Command and Observation Post

In indirect fire support battalions and batteries, the COP serves as both an OP and CP. From it, the fire   support  commander⎯

• Controls the fire and maneuver of his subordinates.
• Conducts reconnaissance of the enemy and terrain in his zone or sector of fire.
• Observes the actions of friendly combined arms units and maintains coordination with them.

Since the artillery battalion is the basic firing unit, its COP is the place where decisions are made and from which orders stem.

The battalion COP normally contains the battalion commander, chief of reconnaissance, and chief of communications. The battery COP normally includes the battery commander and the control platoon leader (who is responsible for reconnaissance and signal functions). In addition to these officers, COPs at both battalion and battery level include fire direction, communications, and reconnaissance personnel. In either case, these personnel can operate the COP either on the ground or mounted in an artillery command and reconnaissance vehicle.

---

Note. Depending on the type of combat action, the chief of communications may be part of the battalion fire control post, rather than the COP.

---

In most cases, the commander of a constituent or dedicated artillery unit colocates his COP with the main or forward CP of the maneuver unit commander to which the artillery unit is constituent or dedicated, or at least locates it near that CP. From that position, both the maneuver and artillery commanders should be able to observe the zone of responsibility or sector of fire. When the artillery unit is neither constituent nor dedicated, but merely supporting and remains directly subordinate to the senior maneuver or IFC commander, its COP is positioned near that commander’s CP.

Other OPs and artillery reconnaissance patrols send reconnaissance data to the COP. The artillery commander determines which targets are to be engaged, and the COP relays target data to the firing position.