WEG MediaWiki

Difference between revisions of "Infrastructure:Arctic"

m (Air Transportation: added a paragraph)
(Medical Facilities)
 
(22 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  
= '''Infrastructure Overview''' =
+
= Overview =
 +
  
Infrastructure is composed of the basic facilities, services, and installations needed for the functioning of a community or society. Infrastructure in the Arctic requires significant hardening against extended deep cold and the rapid freeze-thaw cycle. Buildings will require extensive piering and footings drilled into bedrock as protection against frost heaves. Most countries have limited logistical support in theater, a short working season, and the need to protect against ice damage after building and installation. See each country’s infrastructure variable for details on roads, rail, airports, and seaports.
+
The remote, extreme environment shapes Arctic infrastructure, resulting in significant regional variations. Infrastructure follows population clusters and economic activity as in any other region; however, in the Arctic it is more difficult and expensive to build and maintain. Infrastructure in the Arctic requires significant hardening against extended deep cold and the rapid freeze-thaw cycle. Buildings will require footings drilled into bedrock as protection against frost heaves. Most countries have limited logistical support in theater, a short working season, and the need to protect damage after building and installation.
  
= '''Transportation''' =
+
  
Most transport in the Arctic is done using sea lanes or air transport.
+
Olvana, as an observer in the Arctic is investing heavily in Greenland and Iceland joint ventures, such as observatories and airports.
  
=== Air Transportation ===
+
of large infrastructure projects as key to success, especially near the ice-free port in Murmansk. This includes the development of the Timan-Pechora and hydrocarbon deposits on the continental shelf of the Barents, Pechora and Kara seas, -based marine service complex, including the marine exploration, the use of fiber-optic and satellite communication systems, and monitoring systems, mobile radio communications and wireless access to information and telecommunications network "Internet". .
The American Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) defines the North Polar area of operations as the area north of 78° N latitude, which is north of Alaska and most of Siberia. Civilian aircraft like the Boeing 747-400, 747-8, 777-200ER, 777-200LR, 777-300ER and Boeing 787 as well as the Airbus A340, A350 and A380, with ranges of around 7,000 nautical miles (13,000 km) or more, are required in order to travel the long distances nonstop between suitable airports. The FAA is anticipating increased traffic in the future and has revised its rules to include recovery and diversion plans, and certification to operate in areas of magnetic unreliability.<ref>“[https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Notice/N_8900.449.pdf OpSpec B055, North Polar Operations].” U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration. 5 February 2018.</ref>
 
  
Aircraft travel at an altitude of 31,000 to 39,000 feet and they generally fly 100 miles to the left or right of the North Pole. Right over the Arctic, there is no traditional air traffic control and no radar. Air traffic control uses traditional radio position reports to keep track of the aircraft. Because of the extended flight duration and the prevalence of very cold air masses on the polar routes, the potential exists for fuel temperatures to approach the freezing point. Because of this, the FAA also has expanded requirements for a fuel freeze strategy and communication capability.
+
They intend to make it a national marine highway-oriented year-round operation, which includes river and railway communications and airport networks. This effort will include all supporting infrastructure. Arctic ports and the . Housing, medical, training, and educational infrastructure will be improved as a priority national project. This aggressive effort is due to be complete by 2028.
  
Arctic polar routes are now common on airlines connecting Asian cities to North American cities. Emirates flies nonstop from Dubai to the U.S. west coast (San Francisco, Seattle and Los Angeles), coming within a few degrees of latitude of the North Pole.<ref>[http://routemap.emirates.com/us/english/?_q=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&_refPage=/us/english/destinations_offers/route_maps/route_map.aspx&_refPlatform=ek-com#flights/DXB/LAX Emirates Dubai to Los Angeles Route]. Emirates Airlines. 6 September 2018.</ref>
+
Infrastructure development investment will continue to grow in proportion to Arctic accessibility, resource potential, and political interest. In the short term, maritime port infrastructure will grow fastest of all sectors, with mineral resource extraction growing only as access improves. Development along the NSR will outpace development along the NWP because of preexisting infrastructure and accessibility. Costs to maintain and repair infrastructure will increase as permafrost melting continues, weakening and undermining existing structures. The northernmost communities will experience the most severe impact. This degradation will result in gradual but significant investment requirements., which has the largest Arctic population and more Arctic territory than all other countries combined, will experience the greatest economic impact. Diversion of resources to populated areas may slow the development of infrastructure between isolated communities. The comparatively mild climate of the European Arctic ensures that by 2035 it will remain more connected and developed than Asian or North American Arctic areas.
  
'''FIGURE INFR-1. Transpolar Air Routes'''
+
== Opening of Sea Lanes ==
 +
Decreasing sea ice is extending opportunities for global shipping, in turn increasing the geostrategic importance of the region.
  
=== Maritime Transportation ===
+
== Major Cities and Urban Zones ==
 
+
The following table lists the five largest cities within DATE Arctic. As discussed within the social variable, the majority of the population living in the Arctic is found in Donovia.
The International Maritime Organization implemented the International Code for Ships Operating in Polar Waters, also known as the “Polar Code” in 2014. This new code was an addition to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea. The Polar Code affects ship design, construction equipment, operations, training, and SAR pertaining to ships operating in Arctic and Antarctic waters. To assist in the implementation of the Polar Code, the Arctic Council developed a Web portal at [http://www.arcticshipping.is/ www.arcticshipping.is] containing hydrographic, meteorological, and ice data information needed to plan for safe and environmentally sound navigation in the Arctic.
 
 
 
The following tables is the world’s major icebreaker fleet as of May 2017.<ref>Commander William Woityra. “[http://www.uscg.mil/hq/cg5/cg552/ice.asp Major Icebreakers of the World].” US Coast Guard Office of Waterways and Ocean Policy (CG-WWM). 1 May 2017.</ref> Vessels were selected and organized based on their installed power measured in Brake Horse Power (BHP). Vessels with less than 10,000 BHP (such as the ones operating in the U.S. Great Lakes) were not considered to be capable of independent Arctic operations. Vessels are ordered by age, youngest first, within power groupings. The Baltic icebreakers are designed to operate solely in seasonal, first-year Baltic Sea ice. The ones listed below meet the horsepower criteria for polar operations. However, most Baltic icebreakers have not operated in the Arctic due to concerns with open-water transits. Finally, the tables below do not address whether the crews are military or civilian.
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="3" |'''Donovia'''
 
|-
 
|'''Ship'''
 
|'''BHP'''
 
|'''Notes'''
 
|-
 
|50 Let Pobedy
 
|> 45,000
 
|Launched in 2007.  Nuclear powered. Government owned. Been to North Pole.
 
|-
 
|Sovetsky Soyuz
 
|> 45,000
 
|Launched in 1990,  refit 2014. Nuclear powered. Government owned. Currently unavailable. Been to  North Pole.
 
|-
 
|Rossiya
 
|> 45,000
 
|Launched in 1985,  refit 2007. Nuclear powered. Government owned. Currently unavailable. Been to  North Pole.
 
|-
 
|Yamal
 
|> 45,000
 
|Launched in 1993.  Nuclear powered. Government owned. Been to North Pole.
 
|-
 
|Vaygach
 
|> 45,000
 
|Launched in 1990,  refit 2016. Nuclear powered. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Taymyr
 
|> 45,000
 
|Launched in 1989.  Nuclear powered. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Arktika
 
|> 45,000
 
|Under  construction. Expected 2019. Nuclear powered. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Sibir
 
|> 45,000
 
|Under  construction. Expected 2020. Nuclear powered. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Ural
 
|> 45,000
 
|Under  construction. Expected 2021. Nuclear powered. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Leader-Class
 
|> 45,000
 
|Planned for 2024.  Nuclear powered. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Project 10570
 
|> 45,000
 
|Planned for TBD.  Nuclear powered. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Gennadiy  Nevelskoy
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 2017.  Commercial vessel.
 
|-
 
|Novorossisk
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 2016.  Government owned. Designed for Baltic use.
 
|-
 
|Murmansk
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 2015.  Government owned. Designed for Baltic use.
 
|-
 
|Vladivostok
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 2015.  Government owned. Designed for Baltic use.
 
|-
 
|Sevmorput
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 1988,  refit 2015. Nuclear powered. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Alexey Chirikov
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 2013.  Commercial vessel.
 
|-
 
|Vitus Bering
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 2012.  Commercial vessel.
 
|-
 
|Akademik  Tryoshnikov
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 2011.  Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Varandei
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 2008.  Commercial vessel.
 
|-
 
|St. Petersburg
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 2008.  Government owned. Designed for Baltic use.
 
|-
 
|Moskva
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 2007.  Government owned. Designed for Baltic use.
 
|-
 
|Vladislav  Strizhov
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 2006.  Commercial vessel.
 
|-
 
|Yuri Topchev
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 2006.  Commercial vessel.
 
|-
 
|Pacific  Enterprise
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 2006.  Commercial vessel.
 
|-
 
|Pacific Endeavor
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 2006.  Commercial vessel.
 
|-
 
|Pacific Endurance
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 2006.  Commercial vessel.
 
|-
 
|Kapitan Dranitsyn
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 1980,  refit in 1999. Government owned. Been to North Pole.
 
|-
 
|Kapitan Sorokin
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 1977,  refit in 1990. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Akademik Fedorov
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 1987.  Government owned. Been to North Pole.
 
|-
 
|Vladimir Ignatyuk
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 1983. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Kapitan  Khlebnikov
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 1981. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Kapitan Nikolayev
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 1978. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Krasin
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 1976. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Admiral Makarov
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 1975. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Yermak
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 1974. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Fedor Ushakov
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Started in 2017. Under construction. Commercial  vessel.
 
|-
 
|Stepan Makarov
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Started in 2017. Under construction.  Commercial vessel.
 
|-
 
|Mikhail Lazarev
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Started in 2017. Under construction.  Commercial vessel.
 
|-
 
|Viktor  Chernomyrdin
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Started in 2017. Under construction.  Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Aleksandr  Sennikov
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Started in 2017. Under construction.  Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Aker Arc 130A
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Started in 2017. Under construction.  Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Ivan Papanin
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|To be started in 2019. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Nikolay Zubov
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Planned for 2020. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Project Tundra
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Planned for 2020. Commercial vessel.
 
|-
 
|Aleut
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 2016. Commercial vessel.
 
|-
 
|Pomor
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 2016. Commercial vessel.
 
|-
 
|Norman
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 2016. Commercial vessel.
 
|-
 
|Baltika
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 2015. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Toboi
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 2008. Commercial vessel.
 
|-
 
|SCF Sakhalin
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 2005. Commercial vessel.
 
|-
 
|Ivan Papanin
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 1990. Commercial vessel.
 
|-
 
|Vasiliy Golovnin
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 1987. Commercial vessel.
 
|-
 
|Vengeri
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 1983. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Dikson
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 1983. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Mudyug
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 1982. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Magadan
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 1982. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Kigoriak
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 1979. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Dudinka
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 1969. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Tor
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 1964. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Ob
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Started in 2018. Under construction.  Commercial vessel.
 
|}
 
[[Donovia]] intends to increase its nuclear icebreaker fleet by 2028.
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="3" |'''Canada'''
 
|-
 
|'''Ship'''
 
|'''BHP'''
 
|'''Notes'''
 
|-
 
|John G.  Diefenbaker
 
|> 45,000
 
|Planned for 2022.  Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Louis St. Laurent
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 1969,  refit 1993. Government owned. Been to North Pole.
 
|-
 
|Terry Fox
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 1983.  Government owned. Been to North Pole.
 
|-
 
|Amundsen
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 1979,  refit 2013. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Henry Larsen
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 1988.  Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Sir Wilfrid  Laurier
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 1986.  Government owned.
 
|-
 
|DesGroselliers
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 1983.  Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Pierred Radison
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 1978.  Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Harry Dewolf
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Under  construction in 2018. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Margaret Brooke
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Under  construction in 2019. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Max Bernays
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Planned for 2020.  Government owned.
 
|-
 
|William Hall
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Planned for 2020.  Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Frederick  Rollette
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Planned for 2021.  Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Robert Hampton  Grey
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Planned for 2022.  Government owned.
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="3" |'''Bothnia'''
 
|-
 
|'''Ship'''
 
|'''BHP'''
 
|'''Notes'''
 
|-
 
|Polaris
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 2016.  Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Nordica
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 1994.  Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Fennica
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 1993.  Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Kontio
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 1987.  Government owned. Designed for Baltic use.
 
|-
 
|Otso
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 1986.  Government owned. Designed for Baltic use.
 
|-
 
|Sisu
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 1976.  Government owned. Designed for Baltic use.
 
|-
 
|Urho
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 1975.  Government owned. Designed for Baltic use.
 
|-
 
|Hermes
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 1983.  Commercial vessel.
 
|-
 
|Thetis
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 1983.  Commercial vessel.
 
|-
 
|Voima
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 1954,  refit 1979. Government owned. Designed for Baltic use.
 
|}
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="3" |'''Torrike'''
 
|-
 
|'''Ship'''
 
|'''BHP'''
 
|'''Notes'''
 
|-
 
|Oden
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 1989.  Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Ymer
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 1977.  Government owned. Designed for Baltic use.
 
|-
 
|Frej
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 1975.  Government owned. Designed for Baltic use.
 
|-
 
|Atle
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 1974.  Government owned. Designed for Baltic use.
 
|-
 
|Baltic Icebreaker
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Planned for 2021.  Government owned. Designed for Baltic use.
 
|-
 
|Baltic Icebreaker
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Planned for 2025.  Government owned. Designed for Baltic use.
 
|-
 
|Arctic Icebreaker
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Planned for 2030.  Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Tor Viking II
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 2011.  Commercial vessel.
 
|-
 
|Balder Viking
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 2011.  Commercial vessel.
 
|-
 
|Vidar Viking
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 2001.  Commercial vessel.
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="3" |'''United States of America'''
 
|-
 
|'''Ship'''
 
|'''BHP'''
 
|'''Notes'''
 
|-
 
|Polar Sea
 
|> 45,000
 
|Launched 1978,  refit 2006. Government owned. Currently unavailable. Been to North Pole.
 
|-
 
|Polar Star
 
|> 45,000
 
|Launched 1976,  refit 2013. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|USCG Polar  Icebreaker
 
|> 45,000
 
|Planned for 2023.  Government owned.
 
|-
 
|USCG Polar  Icebreaker
 
|> 45,000
 
|Planned for 2025.  Government owned.
 
|-
 
|USCG Polar  Icebreaker
 
|> 45,000
 
|Planned for 2026.  Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Healy
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 2000.  Government owned. Been to North Pole.
 
|-
 
|Alviq
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 2012.  Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Nathaniel B.  Palmer
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 1992.  Government owned.
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="3" |'''Denmark'''
 
|-
 
|'''Ship'''
 
|'''BHP'''
 
|'''Notes'''
 
|-
 
|Brage Viking
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 2012.  Commercial vessel. Designed for Baltic use.
 
|-
 
|Magne Viking
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 2011.  Commercial vessel. Designed for Baltic use.
 
|-
 
|Loke Viking
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 2011.  Commercial vessel. Designed for Baltic use.
 
|-
 
|Njord Viking
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 2011.  Commercial vessel. Designed for Baltic use.
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="3" |'''People’s Republic of Olvana'''
 
|-
 
|'''Ship'''
 
|'''BHP'''
 
|'''Notes'''
 
|-
 
|Xue Long
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 1993.  Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Haibing 722
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 2016.  Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Haibing 723
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 2016.  Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Polar Support  Vehicle
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Under  construction in 2019. Government owned.
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="3" |'''Norway'''
 
|-
 
|'''Ship'''
 
|'''BHP'''
 
|'''Notes'''
 
|-
 
|Svalbard
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 2002.  Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Kronprins Haakon
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Under  construction in 2017. Government owned.
 
|}
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="3" |'''Estonia'''
 
|-
 
|'''Ship'''
 
|'''BHP'''
 
|'''Notes'''
 
|-
 
|Botnica
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 1998.  Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Tarmo
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 1963.  Government owned.
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="3" |'''Australia'''
 
|-
 
|'''Ship'''
 
|'''BHP'''
 
|'''Notes'''
 
|-
 
|Aurora Australis
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 1990. Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Polar Support Vessel
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Under construction in 2020. Government owned.
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="3" |'''Germany'''
 
|-
 
|'''Ship'''
 
|'''BHP'''
 
|'''Notes'''
 
|-
 
|Polarstern
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 1982,  refit in 2001. Commercial vessel. Been to North Pole.
 
|-
 
|Aurora Borealis
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Under  construction in 2020. Government owned.
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="3" |'''Chile'''
 
|-
 
|'''Ship'''
 
|'''BHP'''
 
|'''Notes'''
 
|-
 
|Almirante Oscar  Viel
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 1967.  Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Polar Support Vessel
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Under  construction in 2021. Government owned.
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="3" |'''South Torbia'''
 
|-
 
|'''Ship'''
 
|'''BHP'''
 
|'''Notes'''
 
|-
 
|Shirase
 
|> 20,000
 
 
 
< 45,000
 
|Launched in 2009.  Government owned.
 
|-
 
|Araon
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 2009.  Government owned.
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="3" |'''South Africa'''
 
|-
 
|'''Ship'''
 
|'''BHP'''
 
|'''Notes'''
 
|-
 
|Agulhas
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 2012.  Government owned.
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="3" |'''Latvia'''
 
|-
 
|'''Ship'''
 
|'''BHP'''
 
|'''Notes'''
 
|-
 
|Varma
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 1968.  Government owned. Designed for Baltic use.
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="3" |'''Argentina'''
 
|-
 
|'''Ship'''
 
|'''BHP'''
 
|'''Notes'''
 
|-
 
|Almirante Irizar
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Launched in 1978,  refit in 2017. Government owned.
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="3" |'''United Kingdom'''
 
|-
 
|'''Ship'''
 
|'''BHP'''
 
|'''Notes'''
 
|-
 
|Sir David  Attenborough
 
|> 10,000
 
 
 
< 20,000
 
|Under  construction in 2019. Government owned.
 
|}
 
 
 
= '''Infrastructure for Torrike and Bothnia''' =
 
 
 
See the Infrastructure Variable for each country for details.
 
 
 
= '''Donovia''' =
 
 
 
In 2014, Donovia published a strategy paper for the development of the Arctic region and national security through 2028. This paper identifies six major development priorities for the Arctic region:
 
 
 
# Integrated socio-economic development of the Arctic zone of Donovia
 
# Development of science and technology
 
# Modernized information and telecommunication infrastructure
 
# Environmental security
 
# International cooperation in the Arctic
 
# Provision of military security, protection, and protection of the state border of Donovia in the Arctic
 
 
 
The paper identified risks and threats to achieving these goals. These included:
 
 
 
* Extreme climatic conditions, including low temperatures, strong winds and the presence of ice in the waters of the Arctic seas
 
* The localized nature of industrial and economic development of the areas and low population density
 
* The distance from the main industrial centers, high resource use and associated economic activities and livelihoods on supplies from other regions of Donovia of fuel, food and essential commodities
 
* Low stability of ecological systems, defining the biological balance and climate, and their dependence even from minor anthropogenic influences
 
* Donovian lack of modern technical means and technologies for exploration and development of offshore hydrocarbon fields in the Arctic
 
* Depreciation of fixed assets, particularly transport, industrial and energy infrastructure
 
* Underdevelopment of basic transport infrastructure, its marine and continental components, aging icebreaker fleet, lack of small aircraft
 
* High energy consumption and low efficiency of extraction of natural resources, the costs of production in the northern no effective compensatory mechanisms, low productivity
 
* Insufficient development of navigation-hydrographic and hydrometeorological support of navigation
 
* Lack of permanent complex space monitoring of the Arctic territories and waters dependence on foreign sources of funds and information management of all activities in the Arctic (including interaction with aircraft and vessels)
 
* Lack of modern information and telecommunication infrastructure that enables the provision of services to the population and economic entities across the Arctic region of Donovia
 
* Lack of development of the energy system, and the irrational structure of generating capacity, high cost of electricity generation and transportation
 
 
 
Donovia is committed to overcoming these challenges, especially in infrastructure. They see implementation of large infrastructure projects as key to success. This includes the development of the Timan-Pechora and hydrocarbon deposits on the continental shelf of the Barents, Pechora and Kara seas, the Yamal Peninsula and Gydan. They plan to build a science-based marine service complex, including the marine exploration, the use of fiber-optic and satellite communication systems, and monitoring systems, mobile radio communications and wireless access to information and telecommunications network "Internet". The Donovians see the Northern Sea Route as a key transportation hub. They intend to make it a national marine highway-oriented year-round operation, which includes river and railway communications and airport networks. This effort will include all supporting infrastructure. Arctic ports and industrial complexes will be modernized and railway lines will tie them into the greater Donovia. Housing, medical, training, and educational infrastructure will be improved as a priority national project. This aggressive effort is due to be complete by 2028.
 
 
 
= '''Greenland''' =
 
 
 
The transportation system in Greenland has no railways, no inland waterways, and virtually no roads between towns. The majority of transportation is done by air year-round, boats in summer, and dog sleds in winter.
 
 
 
=== Energy Production ===
 
 
 
Renewable energy makes up 70% of the public energy supply via the power supply company, Nukissiorfiit. Greenland’s hydroelectric plants include:
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|+'''Hydroelectric Plants in Greenland'''
 
|'''Hydroelectric Plant'''
 
|'''Year Operational'''
 
|'''Output'''
 
|-
 
|Buksefjord Power  Station at Nuuk
 
|1992/2008
 
|45 MW
 
|-
 
|Tasiilaq
 
|2005
 
|1.2 MW
 
|-
 
|Qorlortorsuaq
 
|2008
 
|7.2 MW
 
|-
 
|Sisimiut
 
|2009
 
|15 MW
 
|-
 
|Ilulissat
 
|2013
 
|22.5 MW
 
|}
 
Through the annual Greenland Finance Act account for the Support of Research and Development of Renewable Energy a number of concrete projects are supported, including the installation of solar panels and wind turbines, installation of remote readers and the dissemination of renewable energy. Since 1993, an average of 1% of gross domestic product (GDP) has been invested annually on the development and establishment of hydropower.
 
 
 
=== Sea Ports ===
 
 
 
Greenland has a large number of sea and river ports. The table below lists the sea ports north of the 66th Latitude. Consult [https://msi.nga.mil/MSISiteContent/StaticFiles/NAV_PUBS/SD/Pub181/Pub181bk.pdf National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) Sailing Directions Publication 181] and the [https://msi.nga.mil/NGAPortal/MSI.portal?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=msi_portal_page_62&pubCode=0015 World Port Index] for detailed port information.
 
  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
|+'''Sea Ports of Greenland North of the Arctic Circle'''
+
|+Five Largest Arctic Cities
|'''Name'''
+
!'''City'''
|'''Location'''
+
!'''Country'''
|'''Anchorage Depth'''
+
!'''Pop'''
|'''Remarks'''
+
!'''Pop Dens/km<sup>2</sup>'''
|-
 
|Port of  Illulissat  (Jakobshavn)
 
|69°13′0.00″N  51°6′0.00″W
 
|23.2m  - over
 
|Cargo  pier depth: 6.4m-7.6m
 
 
 
Harbor  type: Coastal Natural
 
 
 
Max  size: up to 154.2 m
 
|-
 
|Port of Oqaatsut (Rodebay)
 
|69°20′60.00″N  51°1′0.00″W
 
|3.4m  - 4.6m
 
|Harbor  type: Coastal Natural
 
 
 
Max  size: up to 154.2 m
 
|-
 
|Port of Attu
 
|67°57′0.00″N  53°43′60.00″W
 
|23.2m  - over
 
|Harbor  type: Coastal Natural
 
 
 
Max  size: up to 154.2 m
 
|-
 
|Port of Igdlorssuit
 
|71°13′60.00″N  53°31′0.00″W
 
|23.2m  - over
 
|Harbor  type: Coastal Natural
 
|-
 
|Port of  Kajalleq Upernavik
 
|72°9′0.00″N  55°31′60.00″W
 
|3.4m  - 4.6m
 
|Harbor  type: Coastal Natural
 
 
 
Repairs:  Limited
 
|-
 
|Port of  Sisimiut  (Holsteinsborg)
 
|66°55′0.00″N  53°42′0.00″W
 
|23.2m  - over
 
|Cargo  pier depth: 9.4m-10m
 
 
 
Harbor  type: Coastal Natural
 
 
 
Max  size: up to 154.2 m
 
 
 
Repairs:  Moderate
 
|-
 
|Port  of Qasigiannguit (Christianshåb)
 
|68°49′0.00″N  51°10′60.00″W
 
|23.2m  - over
 
|Cargo  pier depth: 6.4m-7.6m
 
 
 
Harbor  type: Coastal Natural
 
 
 
Max  size: up to 154.2 m
 
|-
 
|Port of Tasiussaq
 
|73°22′0.00″N  56°0′0.00″W
 
|18.6m  - 19.8m
 
|Harbor  type: Coastal Natural
 
 
 
Max  size: up to 154.2 m
 
|-
 
|Port of Saattut
 
|70°49′0.00″N  51°38′60.00″W
 
|23.2m  - over
 
|Harbor  type: Coastal Natural
 
 
 
Max  size: up to 154.2 m
 
|-
 
|Port of  Qaanaaq  (Thule Air Base)
 
|76°31′60.00″N  68°52′0.00″W
 
|15.5m  - 16m
 
|Cargo  pier depth: 6.4m-16m
 
 
 
Harbor  type: Coastal Natural
 
 
 
Max  size: up to 154.2 m
 
 
 
Repairs:  Limited
 
|-
 
|Port of  Aasiaat  (Egedesminde)
 
|68°42′0.00″N  52°52′0.00″W
 
|23.2m  - over
 
|Cargo  pier depth: 7.1m-9.1m
 
 
 
Harbor  type: Coastal Natural
 
 
 
Max  size: up to 154.2 m
 
 
 
Repairs:  Limited
 
|-
 
|Port of Ukkusigssat
 
|71°4′0.00″N  51°53′60.00″W
 
|23.2m  - over
 
|Harbor  type: Open Roadstead
 
 
 
Max  size: up to 154.2 m
 
|-
 
|Port of Uummannaq (Ũmánaq)
 
|70°40′60.00″N  52°8′60.00″W
 
|23.2m  - over
 
|Cargo  pier depth: 3.4m-4.6m
 
 
 
Harbor  type: Coastal Natural
 
 
 
Max  size: up to 154.2 m
 
 
 
Repairs:  Limited
 
|-
 
|Port of Nanok
 
|75°9′0.00″N  19°46′60.00″W
 
|23.2m  - over
 
|Harbor  type: Open Roadstead
 
|-
 
|Port of Qaarsut (Qaersut)
 
|70°43′60.00″N  52°37′60.00″W
 
|23.2m  - over
 
|Harbor  type: Open Roadstead
 
|-
 
|Port of Ikerasak
 
|70°30′0.00″N  51°19′0.00″W
 
|23.2m  - over
 
|Harbor  type: Coastal Natural
 
 
 
Max  size: up to 154.2 m
 
|-
 
|Port of Upernavik
 
|72°46′0.00″N  56°8′60.00″W
 
|15.5m  - 16m
 
|Cargo  pier depth: 3.4m-4.6m
 
 
 
Harbor  type: Coastal Natural
 
 
 
Max  size: up to 154.2 m
 
 
 
Repairs:  Limited
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Port of  Kangersuatsiaq
+
|
|72°22′0.00″N  55°34′0.00″W
+
|Donovia
|23.2m  - over
+
|
|Harbor  type: Coastal Natural
+
|.
 
 
Max  size: up to 154.2 m
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Port of Scoresby  Sund
+
|
|70°28′60.00″N  21°58′0.00″W
+
|
|23.2m  - over
+
|
|Harbor  type: Coastal Natural
+
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Port of North Star  Bugt
+
|
|76°32′25.01″N  68°50′19.00″W
+
|
|N/A
+
|
|N/A
+
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Port of Niaqornat
+
|
|70°47′60.00″N  53°40′0.00″W
+
|Donovia
|23.2m  - over
+
|
|Harbor  type: Open Roadstead
+
|19.
 
 
Max  size: up to 154.2 m
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Port of  Qeqertarsuaq  (Godhavn)
+
|
|69°13′60.00″N  53°31′60.00″W
+
|Donovia
|12.5m  - 13.7m
+
|
|Cargo  pier depth: 6.4m-7.6m
+
|4.
 
 
Harbor  type: Coastal Natural
 
 
 
Max  size: up to 154.2 m
 
 
 
Repairs:  Limited
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
=== Airports and Heliports ===
+
== Energy ==
 
+
The Arctic climate increases demand and cost of electricity?often requiring communities to generate electricity locally?and reduces the practicality and ability to use other forms of energy.are . Local grids predominate Asian and North American Arctic communities.
Greenland has 14 civil airports and 47 helipads operated by the Greenland Airport Authority. The table below lists the ones north of the 66th Latitude.
 
 
 
An IATA airport code, also known as an IATA location identifier, IATA station code or simply a location identifier, is a three-letter code designating many airports around the world, defined by the International Air Transport Association (IATA).
 
 
 
The ICAO airport code or location indicator is a four-letter code designating aerodromes around the world. These codes are defined by the International Civil Aviation Organization, and published in ICAO Document 7910: ''Location Indicators'' are used by air traffic control and airline operations such as flight planning.
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|+'''Airports and Heliports of Greenland North of the Arctic Circle'''
 
|'''Name'''
 
|'''Location'''
 
|'''IATA'''
 
 
 
'''ICAO'''
 
|'''Remarks'''
 
|-
 
|Aasiaat  Airport
 
|68°43′19″N  052°47′05″W
 
|JEG
 
 
 
BGAA
 
|Runway:  Asphalt, 799 m
 
 
 
Deicing:  No
 
|-
 
|Ilulissat  Airport
 
|69°14′36″N  051°03′26″W
 
|JAV
 
 
 
BGJN
 
|Runway:  Asphalt, 845 m
 
 
 
Deicing:  Yes
 
 
 
International:  Yes
 
|-
 
|Nerlerit  Inaat Airport
 
|70°44′35″N  022°39′02″W
 
|CNP
 
 
 
BGCO
 
|Runway:  Gravel, 1000 m
 
 
 
International:  Yes, seasonal
 
|-
 
|Kangerlussuaq  Airport
 
|67°01′01″N  050°41′22″W
 
|SFJ
 
 
 
BGSF
 
|Runway:  Asphalt, 2810 m
 
 
 
International:  Yes, seasonal
 
|-
 
|Thule Air Base
 
|76°31′52″N  068°42′11″W
 
|THU
 
 
 
BGTL
 
|Runway:  Asphalt, 3047 m
 
 
 
International:  Yes
 
|-
 
|Qaanaaq Airport
 
|77°29′19″N  069°23′19″W
 
|NAQ
 
 
 
BGQQ
 
|Runway:  Gravel, 900 m
 
 
 
International:  Yes
 
|-
 
|Qaarsut Airport
 
|70°44′03″N  052°41′46″W
 
|JQA
 
 
 
BGUQ
 
|Runway:  Gravel, 900 m
 
|-
 
|Sisimiut  Airport
 
|66°57′05″N  053°43′46″W
 
|JHS
 
 
 
BGSS
 
|Runway:  Asphalt, 799 m
 
|-
 
|Upernavik  Airport
 
|72°47′25″N  056°07′50″W
 
|JUV
 
 
 
BGUK
 
|Runway:  Asphalt, 799 m
 
|-
 
|Summit  Camp
 
|72°34′46.50″N  38°27′33.07″W
 
|No  scheduled flights
 
|Runway:  Snow, 4572 m
 
 
 
A  permit from the Danish Polar Center under the auspices of the Home Rule  Government of Greenland is required to visit the station.
 
|-
 
|Aappilattoq  Heliport  (Avannaata)
 
|72°53′13″N  55°35′46″W
 
|None
 
 
 
BGAG
 
|Helipad:  Gravel, 30 x 20 m
 
|-
 
|Akunnaaq  Heliport
 
|68°44′39″N  052°20′25″W
 
|QCU
 
 
 
BGAK
 
|Helipad:  Gravel, 15 m
 
|-
 
|Attu Heliport
 
|67°56′35″N  053°37′20″W
 
|QGQ
 
 
 
BGAT
 
|Heliport  is considered a helistop
 
 
 
Helipad:  Grass, 30 x 20 m
 
|-
 
|Iginniarfik  Heliport
 
|68°08′45″N  053°10′10″W
 
|None
 
 
 
BGIG
 
|Heliport  is considered a helistop
 
 
 
Helipad:  Gravel, 15 m
 
|-
 
|Ikamiut  Heliport
 
|68°37′56″N  051°50′01″W
 
|QJI
 
 
 
BGIT
 
|Heliport  is considered a helistop
 
 
 
Helipad:  Gravel, 15 m
 
|-
 
|Ikerasaarsuk  Heliport
 
|68°08′27″N  053°26′29″W
 
|QRY
 
 
 
BGIK
 
|Heliport  is considered a helistop
 
 
 
Helipad:  Gravel, 15 m
 
|-
 
|Ikerasak  Heliport
 
|70°29′53″N  051°18′11″W
 
|IKE
 
 
 
BGIA
 
|Heliport  is considered a helistop
 
 
 
Helipad:  Gravel, 15 m
 
|-
 
|Ilimanaq  Heliport
 
|69°04′56″N  051°06′31″W
 
|None
 
 
 
BGIL
 
|Heliport  is considered a helistop
 
 
 
Helipad:  Grass, 30 x 20 m
 
|-
 
|Illorsuit  Heliport
 
|71°14′23″N  053°33′20″W
 
|IOT
 
 
 
BGLL
 
|Heliport  is considered a helistop
 
 
 
Helipad:  Gravel, 15 m
 
|-
 
|Innaarsuit  Heliport
 
|73°12′09″N  056°00′40″W
 
|IUI
 
 
 
BGIN
 
|Heliport  is considered a helistop
 
 
 
Helipad:  Gravel, 15 m
 
|-
 
|Ittoqqortoormiit  Heliport
 
|70°29′18″N  021°58′18″W
 
|OBY
 
 
 
BGSC
 
|Runway:  Asphalt, 13.5 m
 
|-
 
|Kangaatsiaq  Heliport
 
|68°18′46″N  053°27′37″W
 
|None
 
 
 
BGKA
 
|Heliport  is considered a helistop
 
 
 
Helipad:  Asphalt, 30 x 20 m
 
|-
 
|Kangersuatsiaq  Heliport
 
|72°22′52″N  055°32′12″W
 
|KGQ
 
 
 
BGKS
 
|Heliport  is considered a helistop
 
 
 
Helipad:  Grass, 27 x 18 m
 
|-
 
|Kitsissuarsuit  Heliport
 
|68°51′29″N  053°07′26″W
 
|QJE
 
 
 
BGKT
 
|Heliport  is considered a helistop
 
  
Helipad:  Gravel, 15 m
+
== Communications ==
|-
+
Communication is , with very high frequency (VHF), high frequency (HF), -, where vast distances between isolated communities and a
|Kullorsuaq  Heliport
 
|74°34′46″N  057°14′08″W
 
|KHQ
 
 
 
BGKQ
 
|Heliport  is considered a helistop
 
 
 
Helipad:  Gravel, 30 x 20 m
 
|-
 
|Moriusaq  Heliport
 
|76°45′50″N  069°59′50″W
 
|None
 
 
 
BGMO
 
|Heliport  is considered a helistop
 
 
 
Not  listed by Naviair
 
|-
 
|Qasigiannguit  Heliport
 
|68°49′02″N  051°10′29″W
 
|JCH
 
 
 
BGCH
 
|Helipad:  Concrete, 20 x 20 m
 
|-
 
|Qeqertaq  Heliport
 
|69°59′58″N  051°18′15″W
 
|PQT
 
 
 
BGQE
 
|Heliport  is considered a helistop
 
 
 
Helipad:  Gravel, 15 m
 
|-
 
|Qeqertarsuaq  Heliport
 
|69°15′04″N  053°32′17″W
 
|JGO
 
 
 
BGGN
 
|Helipad:  Asphalt, 20 x 20 m
 
|-
 
|Saattut  Heliport
 
|70°48′31″N  051°37′36″W
 
|SAE
 
 
 
BGST
 
|Heliport  is considered a helistop
 
 
 
Helipad:  Stones, 15 m
 
|-
 
|Saqqaq  Heliport
 
|70°00′41″N  051°55′56″W
 
|None
 
 
 
BGSQ
 
|Heliport  is considered a helistop
 
 
 
Helipad:  Gravel, 30 x 20 m
 
|-
 
|Savissivik  Heliport
 
|76°01′07″N  065°07′03″W
 
|SVR
 
 
 
BGSV
 
|Heliport  is considered a helistop
 
 
 
Helipad:  Asphalt, 30 x 20 m
 
|-
 
|Siorapaluk  Heliport
 
|77°47′11″N  070°38′18″W
 
|SRK
 
 
 
BGSI
 
|Heliport  is considered a helistop
 
 
 
Helipad:  Gravel, 13.5 m
 
|-
 
|Tasiusaq  Heliport  (Avannaata)
 
|73°22′23″N  056°03′37″W
 
|TQA
 
 
 
BGTA
 
|Heliport  is considered a helistop
 
 
 
Helipad:  Asphalt, 27 x 18 m
 
|-
 
|Ukkusissat  Heliport
 
|71°03′19″N  51°53′01″W
 
|JUK
 
 
 
BGUT
 
|Heliport  is considered a helistop
 
 
 
Helipad:  Stones, 15 m
 
|-
 
|Upernavik  Kujalleq Heliport
 
|72°09′10″N  055°31′52″W
 
|None
 
 
 
BGKL
 
|Heliport  is considered a helistop
 
 
 
Helipad:  Gravel, 30 x 20 m
 
|-
 
|Uummannaq  Heliport
 
|70°40′49″N  052°09′42″W
 
|UMD
 
 
 
BGUM
 
|Helipad:  Asphalt, 20 x 20 m
 
|}
 
  
= '''Norway''' =
+
 +
[[File:DATE Arctic Seaports.png|thumb|Sea ports within the Arctic Region]]
  
The quality of the Norwegian transportation infrastructure is quite good, although its high mountains and deeply cut valleys and fjords combined with a severe northern climate make inland transportation difficult during the winter months. Railroads are located mostly in the south while most of the northern regions are accessible only by ship, car, or aircraft.
+
== Sea Ports ==
 +
Table of Sea Ports in development.
 +
[[File:DATE Arctic Medical Centers.png|thumb|Medical facilities in the Arctic.]]
  
Norway has 371 seaports and 58 airports.
+
== Airports ==
 +
[[File:DATE Arctic Airports.png|alt=Arctic airports|thumb]]
 +
Table of Airports in development.  
  
Norway's energy production, as well as its usage per capita, ranks steadily among the highest in the world. Industry (especially the very energy-intensive aluminum and ferro-alloy industries) consumes 66% of all energy. Norway is one of the largest oil-producing countries in the world, yet hydropower accounts for almost all electricity generation. About 60 percent of all exploitable water resources have already been utilized. Other renewable energy sources in the country are rather limited, and there is a single atomic power plant which has not yet been used for large-scale electricity generation.
+
== Medical Facilities ==
 +
Table of Medical Facilities in development.
  
= '''People’s Republic of Olvana''' =
+
[[Category:DATE]]
[[Olvana]], as an observer in the Arctic Council, has declared itself to be a “near Arctic” country. Olvana is now encouraging enterprises to build infrastructure and conduct commercial trial voyages, paving the way for Arctic shipping routes that would form a “Polar Silk Road”. Olvana believes strongly in developing shipping lanes through the Arctic region that become open due to global warming. Along these lines, the country released its first Arctic policy white paper last January. A majority of Olvana’s interests in the region lie in its major stake in Donovia’s Yamal liquefied natural gas (LNG) project, which is expected to supply China with four million tons of LNG a year. Shipping through the Northern Sea Route would shave almost 20 days off the regular time using the traditional route through the Suez Canal. The white paper said Olvana also targets development of oil, gas, mineral resources and other non-fossil energies, fishing and tourism in the region.
 
<references />
 

Latest revision as of 19:31, 8 February 2022

Overview

Arctic infrastructure includes ports, (including deep-water ports), icebreaking capabilities and support vessels, satellites, aviation assets and airstrips, roads and pipelines. These represent significant and long-

The remote, extreme environment shapes Arctic infrastructure, resulting in significant regional variations. Infrastructure follows population clusters and economic activity as in any other region; however, in the Arctic it is more difficult and expensive to build and maintain. Infrastructure in the Arctic requires significant hardening against extended deep cold and the rapid freeze-

-


-free port in Murmansk. This includes the development of the Timan--based marine service complex, including the marine exploration, the use of fiber-

They intend to make it a national marine highway-oriented year-


Opening of Sea Lanes

Major Cities and Urban Zones

The following table lists the five largest cities within DATE Arctic. As discussed within the social variable, the majority of the population living in the Arctic is found in Donovia.

Five Largest Arctic Cities
Country Pop Dens/km2<
Donovia


Donovia


Donovia


Energy

Communications

-


Sea ports within the Arctic Region

Sea Ports

Table of Sea Ports in development.

Medical facilities in the Arctic.

Airports

Arctic airports

Table of Airports in development.

Medical Facilities

Table of Medical Facilities in development.

Retrieved from "http://odin.ttysg.us/mediawiki/index.php?title=Infrastructure:Arctic&oldid=53460"